T.V. Bhaskaran vs T.V. Narayanan

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Jan 07, 2021

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1726125

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1726125
Court: Kerala High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr. Justice a.Hariprasad,Honourable Mr. Justice P.V.Kunhikrishnan
Decided On: Jan 07, 2021
Case Number: RCRev./395/2018

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

T.V. Bhaskaran

Respondent

T.V. Narayanan

Excerpt

& rcrev..no.395 of 2018 against the judgment in rca no.8 of 2016 dated 17.11.2017 of the rent control appellate authority, kasaragod reversing the order of the rent control court, hosdurg in rcp no.42 of 2013 dated 31.3.2016 t.v. bhaskaran aged 69 years s/o. t.v.karthunhi,tailor,r/at nhanikkadavu,ozhinjavalappu, nileshwaram village, hosdurg taluk respondent/appellant/petitioner: t.v. narayanan s/o. t.v.koran, thonath valappil, kurunthur, padnekad p.o., kanhangad village, hosdurg taluk-671 31507.01.2021, along with rcrev..352/2018, the court on the same day passed the following: rcrev.395 & 352/2018 2 & rcrev..no.352 of 2018 against the judgment in rca no.7 of 2016 dated 17.11.2017 of therent control appellate authority, kasaragod reversing the orderof the rent control court, hosdurg in rcp no.9 of 2014 dated 30.3.2016 p.abdul rahiman aged 52 years s/o hassainar, residing at nhanikkadavu, ozhinhavalappu, nileswaram village, hosdurg taluk. respondent/appellant/respondent: t.v.narayanan s/o t.v koran, thinath valappil, kurunthur, padnekad.p.o, kanhangad village, hosdurg taluk- 07.01.2021, along with rcrev..395/2018, the court on the same day passed the following: rcrev.395 & 352/2018 3judgment[ rcrev..395/2018, rcrev..352/2018 ] dated this the 7th day of january 2021 .. heard the learned counsel on both sides in the above revision petitions.2. the learned counsel for the revisionpetitioners submitted that, the tenants have surrendered the tenanted premises to the respondent- landlord in both the cases and, therefore, the matter has become infructuous. hence, the above revision petitions are dismissed as infructuous. a.hariprasad judge p.v.kunhikrishnan pkk judge

Full Judgment

& RCRev..No.395 OF 2018 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN RCA NO.8 OF 2016 DATED 17.11.2017 OF THE RENT CONTROL APPELLATE AUTHORITY, KASARAGOD REVERSING THE ORDER OF THE RENT CONTROL COURT, HOSDURG IN RCP NO.42 OF 2013 DATED 31.3.2016 T.V. BHASKARAN AGED 69 YEARS S/O. T.V.KARTHUNHI,TAILOR,R/AT NHANIKKADAVU,OZHINJAVALAPPU, NILESHWARAM VILLAGE, HOSDURG TALUK RESPONDENT/APPELLANT/PETITIONER: T.V. NARAYANAN S/O. T.V.KORAN, THONATH VALAPPIL, KURUNTHUR, PADNEKAD P.O., KANHANGAD VILLAGE, HOSDURG TALUK-671 315

07.01.2021, ALONG WITH RCRev..352/2018, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: RCRev.395 & 352/2018 2 & RCRev..No.352 OF 2018 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN RCA NO.7 OF 2016 DATED 17.11.2017 OF THE

RENT CONTROL APPELLATE AUTHORITY, KASARAGOD REVERSING THE ORDER

OF THE RENT CONTROL COURT, HOSDURG IN RCP NO.9 OF 2014 DATED 30.3.2016 P.ABDUL RAHIMAN AGED 52 YEARS S/O HASSAINAR, RESIDING AT NHANIKKADAVU, OZHINHAVALAPPU, NILESWARAM VILLAGE, HOSDURG TALUK. RESPONDENT/APPELLANT/RESPONDENT: T.V.NARAYANAN S/O T.V KORAN, THINATH VALAPPIL, KURUNTHUR, PADNEKAD.P.O, KANHANGAD VILLAGE, HOSDURG TALUK- 07.01.2021, ALONG WITH RCRev..395/2018, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: RCRev.395 & 352/2018 3

JUDGMENT

[ RCRev..395/2018, RCRev..352/2018 ] Dated this the 7th day of January 2021 .. Heard the learned counsel on both sides in the above Revision Petitions.

2. The learned counsel for the Revision

Petitioners submitted that, the tenants have surrendered the tenanted premises to the respondent- landlord in both the cases and, therefore, the matter has become infructuous. Hence, the above Revision Petitions are dismissed as infructuous. A.HARIPRASAD JUDGE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN pkk JUDGE

Same Court & Year Kerala · 2021 Same Parties T.V. Bhaskaran vs T.V. Narayanan Same Judge Honourable Mr. Justice a.Hariprasad,Honourable Mr. Justice P....