Fame Incorporated Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Fame Incorporated vs Collector of Central Excise

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi Decided Oct 05, 1999

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/16921

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/16921
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided On: Oct 05, 1999
Subject: MRTP

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

MRTP

Key legal issue: MRTP

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Fame Incorporated

Respondent

Collector of Central Excise

Legal References

Reported In: (1999)(114)ELT989TriDel

Excerpt

1. the issue involved in this appeal filed by m/s. fame incorporated in whether the benefit of notification no. 175/86 is available to the goods affixed with brand name national, sanyo etc.2. when the matter was called none appeared on behalf of the appellants and the notice issued to them has been received back from the postal authorities with the remarks "closed". we, therefore, heard ld. dr and perused the records.3. we find from the memorandum of appeal that the appellants had themselves mentioned that radio cassette recorder manufactured by them are pre-fixed with the words like "national", "sanyo", "takara" etc.they have also claimed that the products are sold under brand name fame which was owned by them. in the light of their admission that the products are affixed with the words like sanyo and national which are the manufactured & marketed by internationally known brands. the commissioner (appeals) had rightly rejected their appeal. therefore we do not find any reason to interfere with his findings and accordingly the appeal filed by them is rejected.

Full Judgment

1. The issue involved in this appeal filed by M/s. Fame Incorporated in whether the benefit of Notification No. 175/86 is available to the goods affixed with brand name National, Sanyo etc.

2. When the matter was called none appeared on behalf of the Appellants and the Notice issued to them has been received back from the postal authorities with the remarks "CLOSED". We, therefore, heard ld. DR and perused the records.

3. We find from the memorandum of Appeal that the Appellants had themselves mentioned that Radio Cassette Recorder manufactured by them are pre-fixed with the words like "National", "Sanyo", "Takara" etc.

They have also claimed that the products are sold under brand name FAME which was owned by them. In the light of their admission that the products are affixed with the words like Sanyo and National which are the manufactured & marketed by internationally known brands. The Commissioner (Appeals) had rightly rejected their appeal. Therefore we do not find any reason to interfere with his findings and accordingly the appeal filed by them is rejected.

Same Court & Year Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delh... Same Parties Fame Incorporated vs Collector of Central Excise Same Subject MRTP