Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

P.Velmurugan Vs Manimozhi

P.Velmurugan vs Manimozhi

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Jan 30, 2026
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1688903

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CONT P(MD)/3782/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

P.Velmurugan

Respondent

Manimozhi

Excerpt

before the madurai bench of madras high court dated : 30/01/2026coramthe honourable mr. justice k.surender p.velmurugan ... petitioner vs 1.mr.manimozhi, the tahsildar, 2.mrs.periya nayagi,, the taluk surveyor, dindigul district. ... respondents prayer :- contempt petition filed under section 11 of the contempt of courts act, 1971 to take contempt proceedings against the contemnor for non-obedience of the order passed by this court in wp(md) no.3175 of 2025 dated 04.02.2025. for petitioner : mr.c.prithviraj advocate for respondents : mr.b.ramanathan additional government pleader alleging that the order of this court dated 04.02.2025 passed in w.p(md) no.3175 of 2025 has not been complied with, the petitioner has come up before this court with this contempt petition. 2.today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned additional government pleader appearing for the respondents submitted that the order of this court dated 04.02.2025, passed in w.p(md) no. 3175 of 2025, has been duly complied with.3. recording the aforesaid submission, no further order is required in this contempt petition and the contempt petition stands closed. [k.surender, j.] 30.01.2026 ncc : yes/no index : yes/no internet: yes/no cp to1. the tahsildar, dindigul district..2. the taluk surveyor, k.surender,j cp in cont p(md) no.3782 of 2025 date : 30/01/2026

Full Judgment

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 30/01/2026

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDER P.Velmurugan ... Petitioner Vs 1.Mr.Manimozhi, The Tahsildar, 2.Mrs.Periya Nayagi,, The Taluk Surveyor, Dindigul District. ... Respondents PRAYER :- Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to take contempt proceedings against the Contemnor for non-obedience of the order passed by this Court in WP(MD) No.3175 of 2025 dated 04.02.2025. For Petitioner : Mr.C.Prithviraj Advocate For Respondents : Mr.B.Ramanathan Additional Government Pleader Alleging that the order of this Court dated 04.02.2025 passed in W.P(MD) No.3175 of 2025 has not been complied with, the petitioner has come up before this Court with this Contempt Petition. 2.Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents submitted that the order of this Court dated 04.02.2025, passed in W.P(MD) No. 3175 of 2025, has been duly complied with.

3. Recording the aforesaid submission, no further order is required in this contempt petition and the contempt petition stands closed. [K.SURENDER, J.] 30.01.2026 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet: Yes/No cp TO

1. The Tahsildar, Dindigul District..

2. The Taluk Surveyor, K.SURENDER,J cp IN CONT P(MD) No.3782 of 2025 Date : 30/01/2026

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial