C.C.E. Vs. Simplex Mills Co. Ltd.

C.C.E. vs Simplex Mills Co. Ltd.

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi Decided Sep 22, 1999

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/16816

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/16816
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Judge: G B Deva, R T Lajja
Decided On: Sep 22, 1999
Subject: MRTP

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

MRTP

Key legal issue: MRTP

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

C.C.E.

Respondent

Simplex Mills Co. Ltd.

Legal References

Reported In: (2000)(67)ECC111

Excerpt

1. this is an appeal filed by the department against the impugned order dated 16.10.1992 passed by the collector of central excise (appeals), bombay.2. when the matter was called none appeared on behalf of the respondents. however, it was submitted by them that issue involved herein has already been decided by the tribunal in a series of cases.4. the issue involved in the present case is whether "designed printing nickel cylinder" falling under sub-heading no. 8442.00 is eligible for exemption under notification no. 201 /87-ce dated 3.9.1987.5. the collector (appeals) following the decisions of the tribunal has accepted the contention of the party.6. we find that the issue involved herein has been covered by the following decisions of the tribunal:--collector of central excise, bombay-1 v. new great eastern spfg. & weaving co., ltd.,victoria mills ltd. v. c.c.e. bombay since the issue has already been covered and considered by the tribunal in the aforesaid cases, we accept the contentions of the respondent and the appeal filed by the department is hereby dismissed.

Full Judgment

1. This is an appeal filed by the department against the impugned order dated 16.10.1992 passed by the Collector of Central Excise (Appeals), Bombay.

2. When the matter was called none appeared on behalf of the respondents. However, it was submitted by them that issue involved herein has already been decided by the Tribunal in a series of cases.

4. The issue involved in the present case is whether "Designed Printing Nickel Cylinder" falling under sub-heading No. 8442.00 is eligible for exemption under Notification No. 201 /87-CE dated 3.9.1987.

5. The Collector (Appeals) following the decisions of the Tribunal has accepted the contention of the party.

6. We find that the issue involved herein has been covered by the following decisions of the Tribunal:--Collector of Central Excise, Bombay-1 v. New Great Eastern Spfg.

& Weaving Co., Ltd.,Victoria Mills Ltd. v. C.C.E. Bombay Since the issue has already been covered and considered by the Tribunal in the aforesaid cases, we accept the contentions of the respondent and the appeal filed by the department is hereby dismissed.

Same Court & Year Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delh... Same Parties C.C.E. vs Simplex Mills Co. Ltd. Same Subject MRTP Same Judge G B Deva, R T Lajja