Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

The Divisional Manager Vs Alphones

The Divisional Manager vs Alphones

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Mar 02, 2026
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1663379

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CMP(MD)/11840/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

The Divisional Manager

Respondent

Alphones

Excerpt

cmp(md) no. 11840 of 2025 before the madurai bench of madras high court dated: 02-03-2026coramthe honourable mr justice n. anand venkatesh and the honourable mr. justice p.dhanabal cmp(md) no. 11840 of 2025 in cma(md) sr no. 57557 of 20251. the divisional manager united india insurance company limited dr.sankaran road no.2 puveshwari complex namakkal taluk namakkal district. petitioner(s) vs1. alphones s/o.magimaidoss2. amalorpavam w/o.alphones3. beula d/o.alphones4. velankani s/o.alphones (mentally challenged represented thorugh his mother and natural guardian the 2nd respondent herein)5. ganesh babu s/o.dharmar d.no.5/23-7 prasath road aalampatti virudhunagar district.6. muthusamys/o.ponnusamy no.96/10 ponga nagar kudi veethi kuttapalli thiruchenkode taluk namakkal district. respondent(s) for petitioner(s): mr.p.pethurajesh for respondent(s): m/s.s.sarvagan prabhu for r1 to r4 prayer:to condone the delay of 27 days in preferring the above appeal.order(order of the court was made by n.anand venkatesh, j.) this petition has been filed to condone the delay of 27 days in filing the civil miscellaneous appeal.2. notice was ordered on all the respondents on 25.07.2025. r1 to r4 wererepresented by their counsel. paper publication was ordered for r5 and it was effected and his name is printed in the cause list and there is no representation on behalf of him. 3.considering the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit filed in support of the petition, the petition is allowed and the delay is condoned. (n.anand venkatesh j.) (p.dhanabal j.) 02-03-2026 rr

Full Judgment

CMP(MD) NO. 11840 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 02-03-2026

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.DHANABAL CMP(MD) NO. 11840 of 2025 IN CMA(MD) SR NO. 57557 OF 2025

1. The Divisional Manager United India Insurance Company Limited Dr.Sankaran Road NO.2 Puveshwari Complex Namakkal Taluk Namakkal District. Petitioner(s) Vs

1. Alphones S/o.Magimaidoss

2. Amalorpavam W/o.Alphones

3. Beula D/o.Alphones

4. Velankani S/o.Alphones (Mentally Challenged Represented thorugh his Mother and Natural Guardian the 2nd respondent herein)

5. Ganesh Babu S/o.Dharmar D.No.5/23-7 Prasath Road Aalampatti Virudhunagar District.

6. Muthusamy

S/o.Ponnusamy No.96/10 Ponga Nagar Kudi Veethi Kuttapalli Thiruchenkode Taluk Namakkal District. Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s): Mr.P.PethuRajesh For Respondent(s): M/s.S.Sarvagan Prabhu for R1 to R4 Prayer:To condone the delay of 27 days in preferring the above appeal.

ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by N.ANAND VENKATESH, J.) This petition has been filed to condone the delay of 27 days in filing the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal.

2. Notice was ordered on all the respondents on 25.07.2025. R1 to R4 were

represented by their counsel. Paper publication was ordered for R5 and it was effected and his name is printed in the cause list and there is no representation on behalf of him. 3.Considering the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit filed in support of the petition, the petition is allowed and the delay is condoned. (N.ANAND VENKATESH J.) (P.DHANABAL J.) 02-03-2026 RR

Continue Your Research

Same Court & Year Chennai Orders · 2026 Same Parties The Divisional Manager vs Alphones Same Judge Honourable Mr Justice N. Anand Venkatesh,Honourable Mr. Justi...
natural guardian On behalf of high court Has been

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales