Shankar vs Ramsing and Anr

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Orders Decided Feb 28, 2025

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1636501

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1636501
Court: Karnataka Orders High Court
Judge: J.M.Khazi
Decided On: Feb 28, 2025
Case Number: RSA/200292/2024

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Shankar

Respondent

Ramsing and Anr

Excerpt

-1- in the high court of karnataka, kalaburagi bench dated this the 28th day of february, 2025 before the hon'ble ms justice j.m.khazi regular second appeal no.200292 of 2024 (inj) between:1. shankar s/o hamu chavan, age: 65 years, occ:agriculture, r/o. keroor, tq. & dist. kalaburagi. …appellant (by sri. aruna. p. chavan, advocate) and:1. ramsing s/o humu chavan, age: 60 years, occ: agriculture, r/o. keroor, tq & dist. kalaburagi.2. ansubai w/o ramsingh chavan,digitally signed age: 55 years, occ: agriculture, by shivaleela r/o. keroor, tq & dist. kalaburagi. dattatraya udagi …respondents location: high court of this regular second appeal is filed under karnataka section 100 and order 42 of the code of civil procedure. this appeal, coming on for orders, this day,judgment was delivered therein as under:-2- coram: hon'ble ms justice j.m.khazioral judgment(per: hon'ble ms justice j.m.khazi) no representation for the appellant even in the afternoon session. vide order dated 12.02.2025 after granting a week’stime to comply with office objections, a conditional orderwas passed stating that if office objections are not complied with within the said period, necessary orders would be passed for dismissal of the appeal. it appears the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. hence, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. sd/- (j.m.khazi) judge sdu list no.: 1 sl no.: 3

Full Judgment

-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, KALABURAGI BENCH DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.200292 OF 2024 (INJ) BETWEEN:
1. SHANKAR S/O HAMU CHAVAN, AGE: 65 YEARS, OCC:AGRICULTURE, R/O. KEROOR, TQ. & DIST. KALABURAGI. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. ARUNA. P. CHAVAN, ADVOCATE) AND:
1. RAMSING S/O HUMU CHAVAN, AGE: 60 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O. KEROOR, TQ & DIST. KALABURAGI.
2. ANSUBAI W/O RAMSINGH CHAVAN,

Digitally signed AGE: 55 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, by SHIVALEELA R/O. KEROOR, TQ & DIST. KALABURAGI. DATTATRAYA UDAGI …RESPONDENTS Location: HIGH COURT OF THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER KARNATAKA SECTION 100 AND ORDER 42 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,

JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

-2- CORAM: HON'BLE MS JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI

ORAL JUDGMENT

(PER: HON'BLE MS JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI) No representation for the appellant even in the afternoon session. Vide order dated 12.02.2025 after granting a week’s

time to comply with office objections, a conditional order

was passed stating that if office objections are not complied with within the said period, necessary orders would be passed for dismissal of the appeal. It appears the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (J.M.KHAZI) JUDGE SDU LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 3

Same Court & Year Karnataka Orders · 2025 Same Parties Shankar vs Ramsing and Anr Same Judge J.M.Khazi