Shivaraj vs the Tahsildar

Shivaraj vs The Tahsildar

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Orders Decided Mar 27, 2025

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1635783

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1635783
Court: Karnataka Orders High Court
Judge: Chillakur Sumalatha
Decided On: Mar 27, 2025
Case Number: WP/200951/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Shivaraj

Respondent

The Tahsildar

Excerpt

.....of india, praying to issue a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order, or direction, quashing the illegal actions of the respondents in altering the boundaries and creating a new survey map in respect of the schedule property bearing sy.no.236*/hissa 1, measuring 0.18 guntas, situated at maski village, hobali,taluk:maski, district: raichur including the mutation register dated 13.02.2025 is produced here as annexure-e and issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order, or direction, directing the respondents to forthwith cease and desist from interfering with the petitoner’s peaceful possession and enjoyment of the schedule property, and to restore the original boudnaries of the schedule property and etc.this petition, coming on for orders, this day,order was made therein as under:coram: hon'ble dr. justice chillakur sumalathaoral order(per: hon'ble dr. justice chillakur sumalatha) mrs.shridevi b.alba files a memo seeking permission to withdraw the writ petition. -3-2. sri mahabalesh k.patil learned counsel for thepetitioner appears through video conference and submits that in the light of the certain material developments that took place, the petitioner intends to withdraw the writ petition.3. having considered the submission thus made, permission is granted to withdraw the petition.4. the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. sd/- (dr.chillakur sumalatha) judge sn list no.: 1 sl no.: 3 ct : ni

Full Judgment

-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, KALABURAGI BENCH DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA WRIT PETITION NO.200951 OF 2025 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: SHIVARAJ S/O MALLAPPA KUDITINI AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURIST, RESIDING AT WARD NO.10, MASKI TOWN,

…PETITIONER (BY SMT. SHRIDEVI B. ALBA, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. MAHABALESH K. PATIL, ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by LUCYGRACE AND: Location: High Court Of 1. THE TAHSILDAR, Karnataka MASKI TALUK, OFFICE OF THE TAHSILDAR,

2. THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS (ADLR), MASKI, OFFICE OF THE ADLR, [

3. VEERABHADRAGOUDA S/O K.VEERANAGOUDA PATIL, -2- AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, RESIDING NEAR SANTHE BAZAR, MASKI TOWN, …RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 &

227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT, ORDER, OR DIRECTION, QUASHING THE ILLEGAL ACTIONS OF THE RESPONDENTS IN ALTERING THE BOUNDARIES AND CREATING A NEW SURVEY MAP IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY BEARING SY.NO.236*/HISSA 1, MEASURING 0.18 GUNTAS, SITUATED AT MASKI VILLAGE, HOBALI,

TALUK:MASKI, DISTRICT: RAICHUR INCLUDING THE MUTATION REGISTER DATED 13.02.2025 IS PRODUCED HERE AS ANNEXURE-E AND ISSUE A WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT, ORDER, OR DIRECTION, DIRECTING THE RESPONDENTS TO FORTHWITH CEASE AND DESIST FROM INTERFERING WITH THE PETITONER’S PEACEFUL POSSESSION AND ENJOYMENT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY, AND TO RESTORE THE ORIGINAL BOUDNARIES OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY AND ETC.

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,

ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA

ORAL ORDER

(PER: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA) Mrs.Shridevi B.Alba files a memo seeking permission to withdraw the writ petition. -3-

2. Sri Mahabalesh K.Patil learned counsel for the

petitioner appears through video conference and submits that in the light of the certain material developments that took place, the petitioner intends to withdraw the writ petition.

3. Having considered the submission thus made, permission is granted to withdraw the petition.

4. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (Dr.CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA) JUDGE SN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 3 CT : NI

Same Court & Year Karnataka Orders · 2025 Same Parties Shivaraj vs The Tahsildar Same Judge Chillakur Sumalatha