Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Khutejabi vs the Sub Divisional

Khutejabi vs The Sub Divisional

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Orders Decided Dec 18, 2025
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1633611

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Karnataka Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP/109850/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Khutejabi

Respondent

The Sub Divisional

Excerpt

.....wife, r/o. kanasogi, taluk: shikaripura, dist. shivamogga-577 427.5. shankrappas/o sannabaramappa vaddar @ masther, r/o. savikeri, taluk: hanagal, … respondents (by sri. praveen k. uppar, aga for r1) this writ petition is filed under articles 226 and 227 of the constitution of india, praying to issue a writ of certiorari and quash the impugned order dated 07.11.2025 bearing no.ptcl/apsr/01/2025-26 passed by the 1st respondent vide annexure-h, in the interest of justice and equity and etc. -3- this petition coming on for preliminary hearing, this day, order was made therein as under:oral order(per: the hon'ble mr justice anant ramanath hegde) the petitioner has a remedy by way of an appeal before the deputy commissioner under the karnataka scheduled castes and scheduled tribes (prohibition of transfer of certain lands) act, 1978 (‘act of 1978’). if such an appeal is filed, the deputy commissioner shall consider the appeal in accordance with law. if an application is filed for interim measure, same has to be considered as expeditiously in accordance with law.2. registry to return the copy of the impugned order to the petitioner after retaining the xerox copy.3. the time spent in prosecuting this petition from thedate of filing i.e. 16.12.2025 to till today has to be excluded in computing the limitation, if any. sd/- (anant ramanath hegde) judge chs ct:bck list no.: 1 sl no.: 75

Full Judgment

-1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD

DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE WRIT PETITION NO. 109850 OF 2025 (SCST) BETWEEN:

1. KHUTEJABI W/O GOUSEMUDINSAB HONDAD, AGE. 70 YEARS, OCC. HOUSE WIFE, R/O. NO.129, MAIN ROAD, BALIHALLI, SAVIKERI, TALUK: HANGAL,

2. SAIRA BANU W/O IMTIYAZ AHMED NAIKAR, AGE. 50 YEARS, OCC. HOUSE WIFE, R/O. NO.414, KANCHAGAR ONI, HANAGAL TALUKA, MATTU PATTANNA,

3. USMANSAB S/O GOUSEMUDINSAB HONDAD, AGE. 45 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE,

4. HASAMANIYA S/O GOUSEMUDINSAB HONDAD, Digitally signed by CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH

5. HUSSENMIYA S/O GOUSEMUDINSAB HONDAD, AGE. 44 YEARS, OCC. HOUSE WIFE,

6. JARINABANU W/O KUTUBUDDIN MORATAGI, AGE. 35 YEARS, OCC. HOUSE WIFE, R/O. SUBHASH CIRCLE, MATAN MARKET ROAD, HAVERI TOWN, DIST. HAVERI-581 110.

7. HASEENABI W/O NURAHAMAD SHIRAHATTI, AGE. 41 YEARS, OCC. HOUSE WIFE, -2- R/O. SUKAMATTI, HAVERI TOWN,

8. CHAMANSAB S/O NANESAB HONDAD, … PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SRINIVAS NAIK, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. THE SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE, SAVANUR,

2. VIRUPAKSHAPPA S/O SANNA BHARAMAPPA VADDAR @ MASTHER,

3. GIRIJAMMA W/O HANAMANTAPPA MOKANNAVAR, AGE. 67 YEARS, OCC. HOUSE WIFE, R/O. HALLIBAIL, TALUK: HANAGAL,

4. GOURAMMA W/O GANESHAPPA KANASOGI, AGE. 64 YEARS, OCC. HOUSE WIFE, R/O. KANASOGI, TALUK: SHIKARIPURA, DIST. SHIVAMOGGA-577 427.

5. SHANKRAPPA

S/O SANNABARAMAPPA VADDAR @ MASTHER, R/O. SAVIKERI, TALUK: HANAGAL, … RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. PRAVEEN K. UPPAR, AGA FOR R1) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI AND QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 07.11.2025 BEARING NO.PTCL/APSR/01/2025-26 PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT VIDE ANNEXURE-H, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY AND ETC. -3- THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

ORAL ORDER

(PER: THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE) The petitioner has a remedy by way of an appeal before the Deputy Commissioner under the Karnataka Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prohibition of Transfer of Certain Lands) Act, 1978 (‘Act of 1978’). If such an appeal is filed, the Deputy Commissioner shall consider the appeal in accordance with law. If an application is filed for interim measure, same has to be considered as expeditiously in accordance with law.

2. Registry to return the copy of the impugned order to the petitioner after retaining the xerox copy.

3. The time spent in prosecuting this petition from the

date of filing i.e. 16.12.2025 to till today has to be excluded in computing the limitation, if any. Sd/- (ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE) JUDGE CHS CT:BCK LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 75

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial