Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

The Commissioner vs Smt K Subhashini D/O. Sri.Kanala Raghavaiah

The Commissioner vs Smt K Subhashini D/O. Sri.Kanala Raghavaiah

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Orders Decided Jul 29, 2025
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1603832

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Karnataka Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP/147975/2020

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

The Commissioner

Respondent

Smt K Subhashini D/O. Sri.Kanala Raghavaiah

Excerpt

.....ministry of human resources development, (department of school education and literacy), government of india,digitally signed by north block, new delhi: 110001. chandrashekar laxman kattimani …petitioners location: high court of (by shri m. b. kanavi, advocate) karnataka, dharwad bench and: smt. k. subhashini d/o. sri. kanala raghavaiah, age: 56 years, principal jnv, jnv quarters, korlahalli, mundargi taluk, gadag-582118. …respondent (notice to respondent served) this writ petition is filed under articles 226 and 227 of the constitution of india, praying to issue a writ of certiorari by quashing the order dated 6th january 2020 of the hon’ble cat, bangalore in o.a. no.170/00584/2019 on its file (annexure-a in the w.p) and etc. -2-this petition, coming on for orders, this day, orderwas made therein as under following: coram: the hon'ble mr. justice s.sunil dutt yadav andoral order(per: the hon'ble mr. justice s.sunil dutt yadav) learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo which reads as follows: “the advocate for the petitioners humbly submits that, the respondent has attained superannuation and retired from the service and hence the writ petition has become infructuous, hence, the w.p. may be disposed of as having become infructuous in the interest of justice.” in light of the same, petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. (s.sunil dutt yadav) (vijaykumar a.patil) rkm /ct-an list no.: 1 sl no.: 1

Full Judgment

-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.SUNIL DUTT YADAV AND WRIT PETITION NO. 147975 OF 2020 (S-CAT) BETWEEN:

1. THE COMMISSIONER, NAVODYAY VIDYALAYA SAMITI, B.15, INSTITUTIONAL AREA, SECTOR 62, NOIDA: 201307, DISTRICT GAUTAM BUDH NAGAR (U.P).

2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER,

NAVODAYA VIDYALAYA SAMITI, HYDERABAD REGION, N.L.I.BUILDINGS, NALAGANDLA ROAD, POST AND VILLAGE: GOPANPALLY, RANGAREDDY DISTRICT HYDERABAD-500107, TELANGANA STATE.

3. THE UNION OF INDIA, R/BY ITS SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT, (DEPARTMENT OF SCHOOL EDUCATION AND LITERACY), GOVERNMENT OF INDIA,

Digitally signed by NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI: 110001. CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI …PETITIONERS Location: High Court of (BY SHRI M. B. KANAVI, ADVOCATE) Karnataka, Dharwad Bench AND: SMT. K. SUBHASHINI D/O. SRI. KANALA RAGHAVAIAH, AGE: 56 YEARS, PRINCIPAL JNV, JNV QUARTERS, KORLAHALLI, MUNDARGI TALUK, GADAG-582118. …RESPONDENT (NOTICE TO RESPONDENT SERVED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI BY QUASHING THE ORDER DATED 6TH JANUARY 2020 OF THE HON’BLE CAT, BANGALORE IN O.A. NO.170/00584/2019 ON ITS FILE (ANNEXURE-A IN THE W.P) AND ETC. -2-

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER

WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER FOLLOWING: CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.SUNIL DUTT YADAV AND

ORAL ORDER

(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.SUNIL DUTT YADAV) Learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo which reads as follows: “The advocate for the petitioners humbly submits that, the respondent has attained superannuation and retired from the service and hence the writ petition has become infructuous, Hence, the W.P. may be disposed of as having become infructuous in the interest of justice.” In light of the same, petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. (S.SUNIL DUTT YADAV) (VIJAYKUMAR A.PATIL) RKM /CT-AN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 1

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial