Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Collector of Central Excise and Vs. Crompton Greaves Ltd.

Collector of Central Excise and vs Crompton Greaves Ltd.

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai Decided May 12, 1999
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/15798

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Judge
Decided On
Subject
MRTP

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

MRTP

Key legal issue
MRTP

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Collector of Central Excise and

Respondent

Crompton Greaves Ltd.

Legal References

Reported In
(1999)(66)ECC180

Excerpt

1. the appeal by the department against the order of the collector (appeals) holding that the assessee was entitled to the discount on the product manufactured by it claimed in the price list.2. the ground in the appeal, which was reiterated by the departmental representative, is that in the absence of the details of the percentage of discount, the categories of persons which is available, it is not permissible.3. on going through the price list we find that in respect of each product in each price list there is not more than one rate of discount claimed. thus, for example, price list no. 166/9.3.94 with effect from 3.9.93 claimed 20% in respect of all the goods. other price lists claimed different rates of discounts but on different goods. in that situation, there would be no question of any schedule. it will also be evident that the discount was available to all persons in the absence of any restriction in the price list. there is therefore no justification for denying the discount. the circumstances the assessee did not reply to the letters of the department, or continue to avail the discount despite it being denied, may, and indeed ought to have, invited action according to law for this, but are not by itself sufficient to deny discount. we see no reason to interfere.

Full Judgment

1. The appeal by the department against the order of the Collector (Appeals) holding that the assessee was entitled to the discount on the product manufactured by it claimed in the price list.

2. The ground in the appeal, which was reiterated by the departmental representative, is that in the absence of the details of the percentage of discount, the categories of persons which is available, it is not permissible.

3. On going through the price list we find that in respect of each product in each price list there is not more than one rate of discount claimed. Thus, for example, price list No. 166/9.3.94 with effect from 3.9.93 claimed 20% in respect of all the goods. Other price lists claimed different rates of discounts but on different goods. In that situation, there would be no question of any schedule. It will also be evident that the discount was available to all persons in the absence of any restriction in the price list. There is therefore no justification for denying the discount. The circumstances the assessee did not reply to the letters of the department, or continue to avail the discount despite it being denied, may, and indeed ought to have, invited action according to law for this, but are not by itself sufficient to deny discount. We see no reason to interfere.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial