Full Judgment
2. The ground in the appeal, which was reiterated by the departmental representative, is that in the absence of the details of the percentage of discount, the categories of persons which is available, it is not permissible.
3. On going through the price list we find that in respect of each product in each price list there is not more than one rate of discount claimed. Thus, for example, price list No. 166/9.3.94 with effect from 3.9.93 claimed 20% in respect of all the goods. Other price lists claimed different rates of discounts but on different goods. In that situation, there would be no question of any schedule. It will also be evident that the discount was available to all persons in the absence of any restriction in the price list. There is therefore no justification for denying the discount. The circumstances the assessee did not reply to the letters of the department, or continue to avail the discount despite it being denied, may, and indeed ought to have, invited action according to law for this, but are not by itself sufficient to deny discount. We see no reason to interfere.