Jasbeer vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Nov 29, 2022

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1572859

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1572859
Court: Kerala Orders High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr. Justice Bechu Kurian Thomas
Decided On: Nov 29, 2022
Case Number: Bail Appl./8985/2022

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Jasbeer

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

.....officer & defacto complainant : 1 state of kerala, represented by public prosecutor, high court of kerala, pin - 682 031 2 station house officer, panoor police station, panoor-puthoor road, panur, kannur, pin - 670 6923 rosamma johnson, aged 54 years, w/o johnson, 2/208, sanjeepuram, bagayam, velloore, tamil nadu, pin - 632 002 by smt.m.k. pushpalatha, public prosecutor this bail application having come up for admission on 29.11.2022, the court on the same day delivered the following:bechu kurian thomas, j.=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- b.a.no.8985 of 2022 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= dated this the 29th day of november, 2022orderthis is an application seeking pre-arrest bail filed under section 438 of the code of criminal procedure, 1973.2. petitioners are the accused in crime no.458 of 2022 of panoor police station, kannur, alleging offences punishable under sections 420, 406, 294(b), 448, 427, 506 & 120b of the indian penal code, 1860.3. smt. m.k.pushpalatha, the learned public prosecutor, uponinstructions submitted that the investigation was completed in the meantime and a final report has been filed alleging offence under section 448 ipc alone and that too against accused 1 and 2. it was further submitted that petitioners 3 and 4 who were arrayed as accused 3 and 4 in the fir have been deleted and also that the offence now alleged is a bailable offence. in view of the above, the apprehension of arrest of the petitioners does not subsist. accordingly, i close this bail application. bechu kurian thomas, judge rkm

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS TUESDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2022 / 8TH AGRAHAYANA, 1944 CRIME NO.458 OF 2022 OF PANOOR POLICE STATION, KANNUR PETITIONERS/ ACCUSED 1 TO 4 : 1 JASBEER, AGED 39 YEARS, 2 ASMA, AGED 66 YEARS, 3 MUHAMMED, AGED 50 YEARS, SHABNAM HOUSE, CHERNGOTTIL P.O., PUTHUKKODU VIA, RAMANATTUKARA, KOZHIKODE, PIN - 673 633

4 SEENATH, 5 SEENATH, BY ADVS. C.Y.VINOD KUMAR C.ANILKUMAR (KALLESSERIL) RESPONDENTS-STATE, INVESTIGATING OFFICER & DEFACTO COMPLAINANT : 1 STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, PIN - 682 031 2 STATION HOUSE OFFICER, PANOOR POLICE STATION, PANOOR-PUTHOOR ROAD, PANUR, KANNUR, PIN - 670 692

3 ROSAMMA JOHNSON, AGED 54 YEARS, W/O JOHNSON, 2/208, SANJEEPURAM, BAGAYAM, VELLOORE, TAMIL NADU, PIN - 632 002 BY SMT.M.K. PUSHPALATHA, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29.11.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- B.A.No.8985 of 2022 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Dated this the 29th day of November, 2022

ORDER

This is an application seeking pre-arrest bail filed under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

2. Petitioners are the accused in Crime No.458 of 2022 of Panoor Police Station, Kannur, alleging offences punishable under Sections 420, 406, 294(b), 448, 427, 506 & 120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

3. Smt. M.K.Pushpalatha, the learned Public Prosecutor, upon

instructions submitted that the investigation was completed in the meantime and a final report has been filed alleging offence under Section 448 IPC alone and that too against accused 1 and 2. It was further submitted that petitioners 3 and 4 who were arrayed as accused 3 and 4 in the FIR have been deleted and also that the offence now alleged is a bailable offence. In view of the above, the apprehension of arrest of the petitioners does not subsist. Accordingly, I close this bail application. BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, JUDGE RKM

Same Court & Year Kerala Orders · 2022 Same Parties Jasbeer vs State of Kerala Same Judge Honourable Mr. Justice Bechu Kurian Thomas