Harsha S B vs Sunitha S

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Orders Decided Jun 01, 2026

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1551563

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1551563
Court: Karnataka Orders High Court
Judge: M.Nagaprasanna
Decided On: Jun 01, 2026
Case Number: CRL.P/7837/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Harsha S B

Respondent

Sunitha S

Excerpt

.....signed aged about 40 years by sanjeevini j karishetty w/o harsha s b location: high r/o no.159, sai nilaya court of karnataka 4th main bcc layout deepanjali layout bangalore 560040 …respondent this crl.p is filed under section 482 cr.pc (filed under section 528 bnns) praying to quash crl.misc no.51/2025 registered on 06.03.2025 pending on the file of jmfc traffic court v, bengaluru, as an abuse -2-of process of the court, in view of the fact and circumstance of the case and as mis-applying the provisions of the protection of women from the domestic violence act 2005 and all consequential orders; in the given facts and circumstances (based on the respondents pleadings) it is clear that this being a case of an ill-educated and misguided women of this country misusing the provision of the dv actto harass an innocent person for the sin of contracting marriage with an egoistic woman beheld accountable and responsible for fact that shehas lied to the courts by making false submissions and has tried to misuse and manipulate the law to feed her ego. this crl.p, coming on for final hearing, this day,order was made therein as under:coram: hon'ble mr. justice m.nagaprasannaoral orderlearned counsel appearing for the petitioner files a memo seeking withdrawal of the petition. the memo so filed reads as follows: "memo for withdrawal "the petitioner in the above matter prays that this hon'ble court be pleased to permit the petitioner to -3- withdraw the case with liberty to file fresh petition questioning the civil misc 51/2025 before judicial magistrate first class (traffic court v), bengaluru, in the interest of justice and equity." in terms of memo, the petition is disposed as withdrawn. sd/- (m.nagaprasanna) judge bgn list no.: 2 sl no.: 16

Full Judgment

-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 7837 OF 2025 BETWEEN:
1. HARSHA S B AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS S/O BHASKARACHAR R/O SIRI BRUNDAVANA RESIDENCY FLAT 202, 2ND FLOOR 9TH MAIN, SRINIDHI LAYOUT J P NAGAR 8TH PHASE BANGALORE 560062 …PETITIONER (BY SRI: VARDHAMAN V GUNJAL, ADVOCATE) AND:
1. SUNITHA S

Digitally signed AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS by SANJEEVINI J KARISHETTY W/O HARSHA S B Location: High R/O NO.159, SAI NILAYA Court of Karnataka 4TH MAIN BCC LAYOUT DEEPANJALI LAYOUT BANGALORE 560040 …RESPONDENT THIS CRL.P IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 CR.PC (FILED UNDER SECTION 528 BNNS) PRAYING TO QUASH CRL.MISC NO.51/2025 REGISTERED ON 06.03.2025 PENDING ON THE FILE OF JMFC TRAFFIC COURT V, BENGALURU, AS AN ABUSE -2-

OF PROCESS OF THE COURT, IN VIEW OF THE FACT AND CIRCUMSTANCE OF THE CASE AND AS MIS-APPLYING THE PROVISIONS OF THE PROTECTION OF WOMEN FROM THE DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ACT 2005 AND ALL CONSEQUENTIAL ORDERS; IN THE GIVEN FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES (BASED ON THE RESPONDENTS PLEADINGS) IT IS CLEAR THAT THIS BEING A CASE OF AN ILL-EDUCATED AND MISGUIDED WOMEN OF THIS COUNTRY MISUSING THE PROVISION OF THE DV ACT

TO HARASS AN INNOCENT PERSON FOR THE SIN OF CONTRACTING MARRIAGE WITH AN EGOISTIC WOMAN BE

HELD ACCOUNTABLE AND RESPONSIBLE FOR FACT THAT SHE

HAS LIED TO THE COURTS BY MAKING FALSE SUBMISSIONS AND HAS TRIED TO MISUSE AND MANIPULATE THE LAW TO FEED HER EGO. THIS CRL.P, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY,

ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA

ORAL ORDER

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner files a memo seeking withdrawal of the petition. The memo so filed reads as follows: "MEMO FOR WITHDRAWAL "The petitioner in the above matter prays that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to permit the petitioner to -3- withdraw the case with liberty to file fresh petition questioning the Civil Misc 51/2025 before Judicial Magistrate First Class (Traffic Court V), Bengaluru, in the interest of justice and equity." In terms of memo, the petition is disposed as withdrawn. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE BGN List No.: 2 Sl No.: 16

Same Court & Year Karnataka Orders · 2026 Same Parties Harsha S B vs Sunitha S Same Judge M.Nagaprasanna

In the interest of Domestic violence traffic court First class high court E la