Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Ajesh Krishna vs State of Kerala

Ajesh Krishna vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Oct 06, 2022
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1543792

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Bail Appl./7680/2022

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ajesh Krishna

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

.....johnson, the learned counsel for the petitionercontended that the prosecution allegations are false and the incident as alleged had not occurred. it was further submitted that petitioner was arrested on 2-08-2022 and that in the nature of the allegation, the continued detention is not essential for the investigation.5. sri. noushad k.a., the learned public persecutor opposedthe grant of bail and contended that the allegations against the petitioner are serious in nature and releasing him on bail at this juncture would cause prejudice to the investigation. in the result, this application is allowed on the following conditions:-(a) petitioner shall be released on bail on him executing a bond for rs.50,000/- (rupees fifty thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like sum to the satisfaction of the court having jurisdiction.(b) petitioner shall appear before the investigating officer as and when required.(c) petitioner shall not intimidate or attempt to influence the witnesses; nor shall he tamper with the evidence or contact the witnesses.(d) petitioner shall not commit any similar offences while he is on bail. in case of violation of any of the above conditions, thejurisdictional court shall be empowered to consider the application for cancellation, if any, and pass appropriate orders in accordance with the law, notwithstanding the bail having been granted by this court. bechu kurian thomas judge ajm/6/10/22

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS THURSDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2022 / 14TH ASWINA, 1944 Crime No.532 of 2022 of Koodal Police Station, Pathanamthitta PETITIONER/S: AJESH KRISHNA AGED 42 YEARS S/O. CHANDRASEKHARAN NAIR, IRATTAMULLUVELIL HOUSE, MANKODE P.O., KALANJOOR, KONNI TALUK, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT, PIN - 689694 BY ADVS. VISHAK.K.JOHNSON S.NITHIN (ANCHAL) RESPONDENT/S: STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF KERALA, PIN - 682031 BY ADV PUBLIC PROSECUTOR OTHER PRESENT: PP SRI.NOUSHAD K.A THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06.10.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J.

B.A. No. 7680 of 2022 Dated this the 6th day of October, 2022

ORDER

This is an application for regular bail filed under Section 439 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

2. Petitioner is the accused in Crime No.532 of 2022 of Koodal

Police Station, Pathanamthitta District. The offences alleged against the petitioner are punishable under Section 498-A, 306 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code,1860.

3. According to the prosecution, petitioner had physically and mentally assaulted his wife demanding dowry who thereafter

committed suicide on 30-07-2022 and also caused the disappearance of the suicide letter written by the deceased, and thereby the accused committed the offences alleged.

4. Sri. Vishak Johnson, the learned counsel for the petitioner

contended that the prosecution allegations are false and the incident as alleged had not occurred. It was further submitted that petitioner was arrested on 2-08-2022 and that in the nature of the allegation, the continued detention is not essential for the investigation.

5. Sri. Noushad K.A., the learned Public Persecutor opposed

the grant of bail and contended that the allegations against the petitioner are serious in nature and releasing him on bail at this juncture would cause prejudice to the investigation. In the result, this application is allowed on the following conditions:-

(a) Petitioner shall be released on bail on him executing a bond for Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like sum to the satisfaction of the court having jurisdiction.

(b) Petitioner shall appear before the Investigating Officer as and when required.

(c) Petitioner shall not intimidate or attempt to influence the witnesses; nor shall he tamper with the evidence or contact the witnesses.

(d) Petitioner shall not commit any similar offences while he is on bail. In case of violation of any of the above conditions, the

jurisdictional Court shall be empowered to consider the application for cancellation, if any, and pass appropriate orders in accordance with the law, notwithstanding the bail having been granted by this Court. BECHU KURIAN THOMAS JUDGE AJM/6/10/22

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial