Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Smt. Swathi vs Smt. Vimala

Smt. Swathi vs Smt. Vimala

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Decided Jun 23, 2026
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1512976

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Karnataka High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
RFA/101/2026

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Smt. Swathi

Respondent

Smt. Vimala

Excerpt

-1-in the high court of karnataka at bengalurudated this the 23rd day of june, 2026 before the hon'ble mr. justice hanchate sanjeevkumar regular first appeal no.101 of 2026 (res) between:1. smt. swathi d/o. chandraiah, w/o. rajkumar, aged about 30 years, …appellant (by sri. vinod s, advocate) and:1. smt. vimaladigitally signed by d/o. late. seetharama shetty, thejas aged about 58 years, kumar n location: residing at mugalur village, high sarjapur hobli, anekal taluk, court of karnataka bangalore district.2. sri. chandraiah, s/o. late. seetharama shetty, aged about 52 years, -2-3. smt. vedavathi, d/o. rathnamma and late. venkatesh shetty, aged about 37 years,4. kum. thanooja, daughter of shashikala and late. nagaraju, aged about 22 years,5. sri. nikith kumar, s/o. shashikala and late. nagaraju aged about 20 years, both repondents no.4 & 5 are bangalore …respondents this rfa is filed under sec.96 of cpc, 1908 r/wsection 299 of succession act against the orderdated.17.03.2025 passed in p and sc no.5022/2023 on the file of the iii additional district and sessions judge, bengaluru rural district, anekal and etc., this appeal, coming on orders, this day,judgment was delivered therein as under:-3- coram: hon'ble mr. justice hanchate sanjeevkumaroral judgmentlearned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant has filed a memo praying to convert this regular first appeal (rfa) into miscellaneous first appeal (mfa). the said memo is placed on record. in view of the memo, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant is permitted to convert the present rfa into mfa. also, the learned counsel for the appellant is directed to carry out necessary amendments and alterations to make it fit as a miscellaneous first appeal. for statistical purpose, the regular first appeal is disposed of. sd/- (hanchate sanjeevkumar) judge sra list no.: 1 sl no.: 18

Full Judgment

-1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO.101 OF 2026 (RES) BETWEEN:

1. SMT. SWATHI D/O. CHANDRAIAH, W/O. RAJKUMAR, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, …APPELLANT (BY SRI. VINOD S, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. SMT. VIMALA

Digitally signed by D/O. LATE. SEETHARAMA SHETTY, THEJAS AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, KUMAR N Location: RESIDING AT MUGALUR VILLAGE, HIGH SARJAPUR HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, COURT OF KARNATAKA BANGALORE DISTRICT.

2. SRI. CHANDRAIAH, S/O. LATE. SEETHARAMA SHETTY, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, -2-

3. SMT. VEDAVATHI, D/O. RATHNAMMA AND LATE. VENKATESH SHETTY, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS,

4. KUM. THANOOJA, DAUGHTER OF SHASHIKALA AND LATE. NAGARAJU, AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS,

5. SRI. NIKITH KUMAR, S/O. SHASHIKALA AND LATE. NAGARAJU AGED ABOUT 20 YEARS, BOTH REPONDENTS NO.4 & 5 ARE BANGALORE …RESPONDENTS THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SEC.96 OF CPC, 1908 R/W

SECTION 299 OF SUCCESSION ACT AGAINST THE ORDER

DATED.17.03.2025 PASSED IN P AND SC NO.5022/2023 ON THE FILE OF THE III ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, ANEKAL AND ETC., THIS APPEAL, COMING ON ORDERS, THIS DAY,

JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

-3- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR

ORAL JUDGMENT

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant has filed a memo praying to convert this Regular First Appeal (RFA) into Miscellaneous First Appeal (MFA). The said memo is placed on record. In view of the memo, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant is permitted to convert the present RFA into MFA. Also, the learned counsel for the appellant is directed to carry out necessary amendments and alterations to make it fit as a Miscellaneous First Appeal. For statistical purpose, the Regular First Appeal is disposed of. Sd/- (HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR) JUDGE SRA List No.: 1 Sl No.: 18

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial