P.T. Senthil Kumar vs the Commissioner

P.T. Senthil Kumar vs The Commissioner

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Mar 02, 2026

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1492295

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1492295
Court: Chennai Orders High Court
Judge: Honourable the Chief Justice,Honourable Mr Justice R. Suresh Kumar
Decided On: Mar 02, 2026
Case Number: CMP/26259/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

P.T. Senthil Kumar

Respondent

The Commissioner

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at madrasdated: 02.03.2026coramthe honourable mr. manindra mohan shrivastava, chief justice and the honourable mr.justice r.suresh kumar c.m.p.no.26259 of 2025 in w.a.sr no.167770 of 2025 p.t.senthil kumar s/o. late thillai natarajan, old no. 26/27, new no. 90/87 thillaiamman koil street, chidambaram and another applicants vs the commissioner hindu religious and charitable endowments board(hr & ce), no.119 uthamar gandhi salai, nungambakkam, chennai -600 034 and 2 others respondents for applicants: mr.m.kempraj for respondents: mr.s.ravichandran addl. gp (hr & ce)order(order of the court was made by the hon'ble chief justice) heard.2. the appeal is barred by 418 days.3. taking into consideration that the state does not have anyobjection for condonation of delay and further taking into consideration the nature of relief sought for and that no right of private person is crystallized because of the delay in filing the appeal, the delay is condoned. application is allowed. list the appeal for admission. (manindra mohan shrivastava,cj) (r.suresh kumar,j) 02.03.2026 bbr

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 02.03.2026
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR C.M.P.No.26259 of 2025 in W.A.SR No.167770 of 2025 P.T.Senthil Kumar S/o. Late Thillai Natarajan, Old No. 26/27, New No. 90/87 Thillaiamman Koil Street, Chidambaram and another Applicants Vs The Commissioner Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Board(HR & CE), No.119 Uthamar Gandhi Salai, Nungambakkam, Chennai -600 034 and 2 others Respondents For Applicants: Mr.M.Kempraj For Respondents: Mr.S.Ravichandran Addl. GP (HR & CE)

ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) Heard.

2. The appeal is barred by 418 days.

3. Taking into consideration that the State does not have any

objection for condonation of delay and further taking into consideration the nature of relief sought for and that no right of private person is crystallized because of the delay in filing the appeal, the delay is condoned. Application is allowed. List the appeal for admission. (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA,CJ) (R.SURESH KUMAR,J) 02.03.2026 bbr

Same Court & Year Chennai Orders · 2026 Same Parties P.T. Senthil Kumar vs The Commissioner Same Judge Honourable the Chief Justice,Honourable Mr Justice R. Suresh ...

private person chief justice high court The State