Gracy vs Thomas @ Baby

GRACY vs Thomas @ Baby

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Jun 01, 2022

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1483432

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1483432
Court: Kerala Orders High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr.Justice C.S.Dias
Decided On: Jun 01, 2022
Case Number: OP(C)/1664/2017

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

GRACY

Respondent

Thomas @ Baby

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr.justice c.s.dias wednesday, the 1st day of june 2022 / 11th jyaishta, 1944 against the order/judgment in os 191/2013 of munsiff magistrate court,mannarkad petitioner/s: gracy aged 55 years 55 years, d/o. kurian thomas and w/o. raju george,koyikkal veettil, cheenikkapara, palakkayam amsom,desom and post, manarkkad taluk palakkad district.sri.r.sreehari sri.sachin vyas respondent/s: 1 thomas @ baby s/o. george, vellaramkalayil house,cheenikkapara, 2 thomas @ kunhu s/o. augustine, kumbalangal veedu, cheenikkapara, 3 mathew s/o. joseph, ikkara veettil, cheenikkapara, 4 sajeev s/o,mathew, nadumpuram veettil, cheenikkapara, 5 kurian @baby s/o. kurian, parakudiyil veedu, cheenikkapara, 6 bishop bishop house, roman catholica roopatha,palakkad - 678 001. 7 chruch vikari cheenikkapara st. thomas catholic church, palakkayam - 678 591. sri.dalby emmanuel p sri.a.t.anilkumar sri.krishob k.nair smt.v.shylaja this op (civil) having come up for admission on 01.06.2022, the court on the same day delivered the following:judgmentthe learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the original petition may be dismissed as not pressed in the light of the memo dated 18.05.2022. the said submission is recorded. the original petition is dismissed as not pressed. sd/- c.s.dias, judge rkc/01.06.22 appendix of op(c) 1664/2017 petitioner exhibits exhibit p1 photocopy of plaint on o.s no. 191/2013 of munsiff - magistrate court, mannarkkad. exhibit p2 photocopy of the written statement filed by the defendants ih o a no. 191/2013 of munsiff- exhibit p3 photocopy of the written statement filed by the sppldefendants 6 and 7 in o s no. 191/2013 of munsiff-magistrate court, mannarkkad. exhibit p4 photocopy of the report filed by the advocate commissioner in o.s no. 191/2013 of munsiff- exhibit p4(a) photocopy of the plan filed along with the advocate commissioner's report exhibit p5 photocopy of affidavit and.....

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS WEDNESDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF JUNE 2022 / 11TH JYAISHTA, 1944 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN OS 191/2013 OF MUNSIFF MAGISTRATE COURT,MANNARKAD PETITIONER/S: GRACY AGED 55 YEARS 55 YEARS, D/O. KURIAN THOMAS AND W/O. RAJU GEORGE,KOYIKKAL VEETTIL, CHEENIKKAPARA, PALAKKAYAM AMSOM,DESOM AND POST, MANARKKAD TALUK PALAKKAD DISTRICT.
SRI.R.SREEHARI SRI.SACHIN VYAS RESPONDENT/S: 1 THOMAS @ BABY S/O. GEORGE, VELLARAMKALAYIL HOUSE,CHEENIKKAPARA, 2 THOMAS @ KUNHU S/O. AUGUSTINE, KUMBALANGAL VEEDU, CHEENIKKAPARA, 3 MATHEW S/O. JOSEPH, IKKARA VEETTIL, CHEENIKKAPARA, 4 SAJEEV S/O,MATHEW, NADUMPURAM VEETTIL, CHEENIKKAPARA, 5 KURIAN @BABY S/O. KURIAN, PARAKUDIYIL VEEDU, CHEENIKKAPARA, 6 BISHOP BISHOP HOUSE, ROMAN CATHOLICA ROOPATHA,PALAKKAD - 678 001. 7 CHRUCH VIKARI CHEENIKKAPARA ST. THOMAS CATHOLIC CHURCH, PALAKKAYAM - 678 591. SRI.DALBY EMMANUEL P SRI.A.T.ANILKUMAR SRI.KRISHOB K.NAIR SMT.V.SHYLAJA THIS OP (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01.06.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the original petition may be dismissed as not pressed in the light of the memo dated 18.05.2022. The said submission is recorded. The original petition is dismissed as not pressed. Sd/- C.S.DIAS, JUDGE rkc/01.06.22 APPENDIX OF OP(C) 1664/2017 PETITIONER EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 PHOTOCOPY OF PLAINT ON O.S NO. 191/2013 OF MUNSIFF - MAGISTRATE COURT, MANNARKKAD. EXHIBIT P2 PHOTOCOPY OF THE WRITTEN STATEMENT FILED BY THE DEFENDANTS IH O A NO. 191/2013 OF MUNSIFF- EXHIBIT P3 PHOTOCOPY OF THE WRITTEN STATEMENT FILED BY THE SPPLDEFENDANTS 6 AND 7 IN O S NO. 191/2013 OF MUNSIFF-MAGISTRATE COURT, MANNARKKAD. EXHIBIT P4 PHOTOCOPY OF THE REPORT FILED BY THE ADVOCATE COMMISSIONER IN O.S NO. 191/2013 OF MUNSIFF- EXHIBIT P4(A) PHOTOCOPY OF THE PLAN FILED ALONG WITH THE ADVOCATE COMMISSIONER'S REPORT EXHIBIT P5 PHOTOCOPY OF AFFIDAVIT AND APPLICATION IA EXHIBIT P6 PHOTOCOPY OF THE OBJECTION FILED BY THE RESPONDENTS 1 TO 5 IN IA 319/2017 IN OS NO. EXHIBIT P7 PHOTOCOPY OF THE OBJECTION FILED BY THE RESPONDENTS 6 AND 7 IN IA NO. 319/2017 IN OS NO. 191/2013 OF MUNSIFF-MAGISTRATE COURT, EXHIBIT P8 PHOTOCOPY OF THE ORDER PASSED IN IA 319/2017 IN OS NO. 191/2013 OF MUNSIFF-MAGISTRATE COURT, MANNARKKAD.DATED 31-03-2017. EXHIBIT P9 PHOTOCOPY OF THE JUDGMENT PASSED IN OP(C) NO.

Same Court & Year Kerala Orders · 2022 Same Parties GRACY vs Thomas @ Baby Same Judge Honourable Mr.Justice C.S.Dias

Written statement magistrate court Roman Catholic high court