Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

The Managing Director vs Sumathi

The Managing Director vs Sumathi

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Apr 30, 2026
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1448286

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CMP/12478/2023

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

The Managing Director

Respondent

Sumathi

Excerpt

c.m.p.no.12478 of 2023 in c.m.a.sr.no.68650 of 2023r.kalaimathi, j.the 1st respondent, despite the receipt of notice for herself and on behalf of the minor respondents 2 and 3, she neither appeared nor entered appearance through her counsel. 2.notice sent to the 4th respondent, who is the mother of the 1 st respondent has been returned with an endorsement ‘deceased’. 3.accepting the averments made in the accompanying affidavit filed in support of the above petition, the petition is ordered. the delay of 96 days in filing the above cma is hereby condoned. 30.04.2026 kas https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Full Judgment

C.M.P.No.12478 of 2023 in C.M.A.SR.No.68650 of 2023

R.KALAIMATHI, J.

The 1st respondent, despite the receipt of notice for herself and on behalf of the minor respondents 2 and 3, she neither appeared nor entered appearance through her counsel. 2.Notice sent to the 4th respondent, who is the mother of the 1 st respondent has been returned with an endorsement ‘deceased’. 3.Accepting the averments made in the accompanying affidavit filed in support of the above petition, the petition is ordered. The delay of 96 days in filing the above CMA is hereby condoned. 30.04.2026 kas https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Continue Your Research

Same Court & Year Chennai Orders · 2026 Same Parties The Managing Director vs Sumathi Same Judge Honourable Mrs.Justice R. Kalaimathi
On behalf of Has been H Res

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales