Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Ajmal vs State of Kerala

AJMAL vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Mar 14, 2022
~4 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1444309

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Bail Appl./548/2022

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

AJMAL

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

.....against the petitioner is pointed out. it is submitted that the crime though registered in 2015 is to be thoroughly investigated and for the same purposes the custodial interrogation of the petitioner is absolutely necessary.5. having regard to the facts and circumstances of thecase and considering the nature of the allegation taking into account of the fact that the petitioner was working as an accountant who had deposited the amount collected including the counterfeit currency into the account of the company in which he was working, i am of the view that the petitioner can be granted anticipatory bail subject to the following conditions.in the result, this application is allowed. it is directed that the petitioner shall be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of arrest in crime no.570/2015 mukkam police station, kozhikkode district subject to the following conditions:-(i) petitioner shall execute bond for a sum of rs.50,000/- (rupees fifty thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like sum to the satisfaction of the jurisdictional court;(ii) petitioner shall appear before the investigating officer in bail appl. no. 548 of 2022 4 crime no.570/2015 mukkam police station, kozhikkode district at 10.00 a.m on 18-03-2022 & 19-03-2022 and thereafter whenever called upon to do so;(iii) petitioner shall not attempt to contact or interfere with the investigation or to influence or intimidate any witness in crime no. 570/2015 mukkam police station, kozhikkode district ;(iv) petitioner shall not involve in any other crime while onbail. if any of the aforesaid conditions are violated, the investigating officer in crime no.570/2015 mukkam police station, kozhikkode district may file an application before the jurisdictional court for cancellation of bail. sd/- gopinath p. judgeats bail appl. no. 548 of 2022 5 appendix of bail appl. 548/2022 petitioner annexures annexure -a a true copy of the fir no.570/2015 dtd. 09.12.2015 registered on the files of.....

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P. MONDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF MARCH 2022 / 23RD PHALGUNA, 1943 BAIL APPL. NO. 548 OF 2022 CRIME NO.570/2015 MUKKAM POLICE STATION, KOZHIKKODE DISTRICT PETITIONER/ACCUSED: AJMAL AGED 31 YEARS,S/O.AHAMMED C. CHALIL HOUSE, CHERUVADI PO, MAVOOR VIA, KOZHIKODE, PIN - 673661 BY ADVS. RAMEEZ NOOH P.RAFTHAS RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT: STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF KERALA ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682031 BY ADV PUBLIC PROSECUTOR OTHER PRESENT: SMT. SEETHA .S. (SR.PP) THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14.03.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: BAIL APPL. NO. 548 OF 2022 2

ORDER

This is an application for anticipatory bail.

2. Petitioner is the accused in crime No.570/2015 Mukkam Police Station, Kozhikkode District alleging commission of offences under Section 489 (B) of the Indian Penal Code. The allegation against the petitioner is that he deposited certain amounts in the Federal Bank of India account

of “Highlife Ayurvedic Multi Speciality Hospital” which contained 12 counterfeit currency notes each of the value of Rs.1,000/- (Rupees Thousand Only) and thereby committed the offences alleged against him.

3. The learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was working as an accountant in the

aforesaid hospital on the relavent date. It is submitted that the petitioner had only depostied the collections in the account of the hospital and he had no role whatsoever with the alleged counterfeit notes. It is submitted that Annexure C certificate will show that the petitioner was working as an accountant at the relevant point of time. It is also pointed out with reference to Annexure B, that even the bank has no case that it was the petitioner who had deposited the counterfeit notes. BAIL APPL. NO. 548 OF 2022 3

4. The learned Public Prosecutor opposes the grant of

bail. The seriousness of offence alleged against the petitioner is pointed out. It is submitted that the crime though registered in 2015 is to be thoroughly investigated and for the same purposes the custodial interrogation of the petitioner is absolutely necessary.

5. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the

case and considering the nature of the allegation taking into account of the fact that the petitioner was working as an accountant who had deposited the amount collected including the counterfeit currency into the account of the company in which he was working, I am of the view that the petitioner can be granted anticipatory bail subject to the following conditions.

In the result, this application is allowed. It is directed that the petitioner shall be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of arrest in Crime No.570/2015 Mukkam Police Station, Kozhikkode District subject to the following conditions:-

(i) Petitioner shall execute bond for a sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees fifty thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like sum to the satisfaction of the jurisdictional Court;

(ii) Petitioner shall appear before the investigating officer in BAIL APPL. NO. 548 OF 2022 4 Crime No.570/2015 Mukkam Police Station, Kozhikkode District at 10.00 A.M on 18-03-2022 & 19-03-2022 and thereafter whenever called upon to do so;

(iii) Petitioner shall not attempt to contact or interfere with the investigation or to influence or intimidate any witness in Crime No. 570/2015 Mukkam Police Station, Kozhikkode District ;

(iv) Petitioner shall not involve in any other crime while on

bail. If any of the aforesaid conditions are violated, the Investigating officer in Crime No.570/2015 Mukkam Police Station, Kozhikkode District may file an application before the jurisdictional Court for cancellation of bail. Sd/- GOPINATH P. JUDGE

ats BAIL APPL. NO. 548 OF 2022 5 APPENDIX OF BAIL APPL. 548/2022 PETITIONER ANNEXURES ANNEXURE -A A TRUE COPY OF THE FIR NO.570/2015 DTD. 09.12.2015 REGISTERED ON THE FILES OF MUKKAM POLICE STATION,KOZHIKODE ANNEXURE-B TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DTD. NIL FILED BY THE ASSISTANT MANAGER OF FEDERAL BANK, MUKKAM BRANCH BEFORE THE MUKKAM POLICE STATION. ANNEXURE-C TRUE COPY OF THE EXPERIENCE CERTIFICATE DTD.15.01.2018 ISSUED BY THE M/S. HIGHLIFE AYURVEDIC MULTI SPECIALTY HOSPITAL, MUKKAM, KOZHIKODE ANNEXURE-D TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DTD. 03.01.2022 IN CRL.MC NO. 1806/2021 ON THE FILES OF ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE-I, KOZHIKODE.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial