Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

A.Prakesh Vs The State Commissioner for Differently Abled

A.Prakesh vs The State Commissioner for Differently Abled

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Mar 25, 2026
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1431810

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP/10454/2026

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

A.Prakesh

Respondent

The State Commissioner for Differently Abled

Excerpt

.....since the same has not been considered, the petitioner has filed this writ petition.3.mr.m.shajahan, learned special government pleader, accepts notice for the respondents 1 and 2, mr.e.c.ramesh, learned senior counsel, accepts notice on behalf of the 3rd respondent. page2 of 4 4.no prejudice would be caused to the respondents if the petitioner’s representation, as stated supra, is considered on merits and in accordance with law, within a time frame to be fixed by this court. this court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioner’s representation.5.for the foregoing reasons, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the 3rd respondent to pass final orders on merits and in accordance with law on the petitioner’s representation dated 19.01.2026, seeking for license in his favour to run a bunk shop at any permitted place in 100 feet road, taramani, chennai, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. however, there shall be no order as to costs.index: yes/no (2/2)speaking/non-speaking orderneutral citation: yes/no gsa page3 of 4abdul quddhose, j.gsa to1. the state commissioner for differently abled o/o.state commissioner for differently abled, chennai-600 003. (2/2) page4 of 4

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 25-03-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE A.Prakash, S/o. Arumugam, No.353, Sudandira Nagar, Moors Road, Thousand Lights, ..Petitioner Chennai 600 006. Vs

1. The State Commissioner for Differently Abled o/o.State Commissioner for Differently Abled, Chennai-600 003. ..Respondents

PRAYER - This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 3rd respondent to consider (or) Page1 of 4 dispose of the petitioner’s representation dated 19.01.2026, to issue licence to the petitioner for running and Bunk Shop at any permitted nearby place of 100 feet Road Tharamani, Chennai. For Petitioner(s): Mr.R.Anbu For Respondent(s): MR.M.Shajahan, Special Government Pleader (For R1 & R2) Mr.E.C.Ramesh, Senior Counsel (For R3)

ORDER

This Writ Petition has been filed to direct the 3 rd respondent to issue licence to the petitioner for running a Bunk Shop at any place in 100 feet road, Taramani, Chennai, based on the petitioner’s representation dated 19.01.2026, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

2.The petitioner claims that he is a physically challenged person. He seeks for grant of license to run a Bunk Shop in any permitted place in 100 feet road, Taramani, Chennai. The petitioner had given a representation on 19.01.2026, for the aforesaid purpose to the 3rd respondent. Since the same has not been considered, the petitioner has filed this Writ Petition.

3.Mr.M.Shajahan, learned Special Government Pleader, accepts notice for the respondents 1 and 2, Mr.E.C.Ramesh, learned Senior Counsel, accepts notice on behalf of the 3rd respondent. Page2 of 4 4.No prejudice would be caused to the respondents if the petitioner’s representation, as stated supra, is considered on merits and in accordance with law, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. This Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioner’s representation.

5.For the foregoing reasons, this Writ Petition is disposed of by directing the 3rd respondent to pass final orders on merits and in accordance with law on the petitioner’s representation dated 19.01.2026, seeking for license in his favour to run a Bunk Shop at any permitted place in 100 feet road, Taramani, Chennai, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. However, there shall be no order as to costs.

Index: Yes/No (2/2)

Speaking/Non-speaking order

Neutral Citation: Yes/No GSA Page3 of 4

ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.

GSA To

1. The State Commissioner for Differently Abled o/o.State Commissioner for Differently Abled, Chennai-600 003. (2/2) Page4 of 4

Continue Your Research

Same Court & Year Chennai · 2026 Same Parties A.Prakesh vs The State Commissioner for Differently Abled Same Judge Honourable Mr Justice Abdul Quddhose

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales