Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Goodyear India Ltd. Vs. Cc

Goodyear India Ltd. vs Cc

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi Decided Sep 07, 1998
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/14290

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Customs

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Customs

Key legal issue
Customs

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Goodyear India Ltd.

Respondent

Cc

Legal References

Reported In
(1999)(82)LC174Tri(Delhi)

Excerpt

.....and apparatus for measuring or checking viscosity, porosity, expansion, surface tension or the like; instruments and apparatus for measuring or checking quantities of heat, sound or light (including exposure9027.80 -- other instruments and apparatus90.31 measurement or checking instruments, appliances and machines, not specified or included elsewhere in this chapter; 4. lower appellate authority has admitted that the instrument, no doubt, does the chemical analysis but the benefit of the notification has been denied to the appellant on the ground that the said instrument can perform much more functions than this. it has not been elaborated in the order as to what further function it does, but keeping in view what has been reproduced in the impugned order earlier from the catalogue relating to ozone aging tester, the instrument with the help of a micro processor does the calculation and makes it easy for analysing and controlling total measurements. the machine has been described as easy to operate and labour saving machine, in view of the foregoing there is no doubt that ozone aging tester is an instrument for chemical analysis as admitted to the lower appellate authority and is therefore, classifiable under tariff sub-heading no. 9027.80 as claimed by the id. advocate of the appellants shri r. sudhinder.consequently the appellants would also be entitled to the benefit of notification no. 311/86-cus.5. in sum and substance, the appeal of the appellant herein is allowed after we set aside the impugned order. consequential relief be extended to the appellants.

Full Judgment

1. Question involved in the present matter is regarding the classification of an instrument described as "one set of ozone aging tester." The appellants contend that it falls under Tariff sub-heading 9027.80 whereas the Revenue contends that it falls under 9031.80. It is not disputed that if the appellants succeed in their contention regarding classification benefit of notification No. 311/86-Cus. would be available to them.

3. In order to appreciate rival contentions, it is necessary to reproduce relevant headings 9027 and 9031 and the relevant sub-headings which are as under:90.27 Instruments and apparatus for physical orchemical analysis (for example, polarimeters, refractometers, spectrometers, gas or smoke analysis apparatus); instruments and apparatus for measuring or checking viscosity, porosity, expansion, surface tension or the like; instruments and apparatus for measuring or checking quantities of heat, sound or light (including exposure9027.80 -- Other instruments and apparatus90.31 Measurement or checking instruments, appliances and machines, not specified or included elsewhere in this Chapter; 4. Lower appellate authority has admitted that the instrument, no doubt, does the chemical analysis but the benefit of the notification has been denied to the appellant on the ground that the said instrument can perform much more functions than this. It has not been elaborated in the order as to what further function it does, but keeping in view what has been reproduced in the impugned order earlier from the catalogue relating to ozone aging tester, the instrument with the help of a micro processor does the calculation and makes it easy for analysing and controlling total measurements. The machine has been described as easy to operate and labour saving machine, in view of the foregoing there is no doubt that Ozone Aging Tester is an instrument for chemical analysis as admitted to the lower appellate authority and is therefore, classifiable under Tariff sub-heading No. 9027.80 as claimed by the Id. advocate of the appellants Shri R. Sudhinder.

Consequently the appellants would also be entitled to the benefit of notification No. 311/86-Cus.

5. In sum and substance, the appeal of the appellant herein is allowed after we set aside the impugned order. Consequential relief be extended to the appellants.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial