J.Raja vs Union of India

J.RAJA vs Union of India

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Mar 10, 2026

~3 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1426519

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1426519
Court: Chennai High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr Justice Abdul Quddhose
Decided On: Mar 10, 2026
Case Number: WP/7914/2026

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

J.RAJA

Respondent

Union of India

Excerpt

.....frame. for petitioner(s): mr.r.ganesan for respondent(s): mr.r.sreedhar, agp(pondy)orderthis writ petition has been filed to direct the second respondent to re-determine the compensation as per the provisions of section 28-a of the land acquisition act, 1894 in favour of the petitioner on par with the award passed in favour of the other landholders under the same government order in a.s. nos.249 and 250 of 2018 dated 17.10.2023.2.the petitioner claims that since the other land holders are having the benefit of higher compensation as per the judgment dated 17.10.2023 passed in a.s. nos.249 and 250 of 2018, the petitioner also seeks for the same re- determination of compensation on par with others. in such circumstances, the petitioner had filed an application under section 28-a of the land acquisition act with the second respondent on 27.11.2023. since the said application has not been considered till date, the petitioner has filed this writ petition.3.mr.r.sreedhar, learned additional government pleader (puducherry) accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. 4.no prejudice would be caused to the respondents if the petitioner’s application, as stated supra, is considered, on merits and in accordance with lawafter giving due consideration to the supporting documents filed by the petitioner, within a time frame to be fixed by this court. 5.this court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioner’s application filed under section 28-a of the land acquisition act, 1894. 6.for the foregoing reasons, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the second respondent to pass final orders, on merits and in accordance with law on the petitioner’s application dated 27.11.2023 filed under section 28-a of the land acquisition act, 1894 seeking for re-determination of the compensation on par with others, who are having the benefit of the judgment dated 17.10.2023 passed in a.s. nos.249 and 250 of 2018, which pertain to the very same government order.....

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 10-03-2026
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE J.Raja Petitioner(s) Vs
1. Union Of India Respondent(s)
PRAYER directing the 2nd respondent to dispose the unnumbered miscellaneous petition No. of 2023 filed by the petitioner u/s. 28-A of the Land Acquisition Act 1894 on 27.11.2023 directing to re determine the compensation at par with the enhanced compensation fixed by this Honble division Bench of this court in AS. No. 249/ 2018 and 250/2018 dated 17.10.2023 within a stipulated time frame. For Petitioner(s): Mr.R.Ganesan For Respondent(s): Mr.R.Sreedhar, AGP(Pondy)

ORDER

This writ petition has been filed to direct the second respondent to re-determine the compensation as per the provisions of Section 28-A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 in favour of the petitioner on par with the award passed in favour of the other landholders under the same Government Order in A.S. Nos.249 and 250 of 2018 dated 17.10.2023.

2.The petitioner claims that since the other land holders are having the benefit of higher compensation as per the judgment dated 17.10.2023 passed in A.S. Nos.249 and 250 of 2018, the petitioner also seeks for the same re- determination of compensation on par with others. In such circumstances, the petitioner had filed an application under Section 28-A of the Land Acquisition Act with the second respondent on 27.11.2023. Since the said application has not been considered till date, the petitioner has filed this writ petition.

3.Mr.R.Sreedhar, learned Additional Government Pleader (Puducherry) accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. 4.No prejudice would be caused to the respondents if the petitioner’s application, as stated supra, is considered, on merits and in accordance with law

after giving due consideration to the supporting documents filed by the petitioner, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. 5.This Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioner’s application filed under Section 28-A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. 6.For the foregoing reasons, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the second respondent to pass final orders, on merits and in accordance with law on the petitioner’s application dated 27.11.2023 filed under Section 28-A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 seeking for re-determination of the compensation on par with others, who are having the benefit of the judgment dated 17.10.2023 passed in A.S. Nos.249 and 250 of 2018, which pertain to the very same Government Order under which the land was acquired, after giving due consideration to the supporting documents filed by the petitioner, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs.

vga To 1.Union Of India ABDUL QUDDHOSE J. vga

Same Court & Year Chennai · 2026 Same Parties J.RAJA vs Union of India Same Judge Honourable Mr Justice Abdul Quddhose