Ganeshkumar Alias Dhaneshkumar Vs State represented by

Ganeshkumar Alias Dhaneshkumar vs State represented by

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Jan 30, 2026

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1419395

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1419395
Court: Chennai Orders High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr.Justice K.Rajasekar
Decided On: Jan 30, 2026
Case Number: CRL OP/2102/2026

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ganeshkumar Alias Dhaneshkumar

Respondent

State represented by

Excerpt

.....from the complainant to purchase liquor. when the complainant did not give money, the petitioner attacked him with a broken bottle, causing injuries. hence, the case has been registered.3. the learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioneris ranked as a1 in this case and was also injured in the alleged occurrence. he further submitted that the petitioner is also taking treatment and he is ready to cooperate with the investigation. therefore, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.4. the learned government advocate (crl.side) appearing for therespondent police reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that the petitioner is a habitual offender and is already involved in six previous cases, out of which four cases are under 307 ipc. hence, he opposed the grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.5. considering the fact that the petitioner is a habitual offender and in this casehe attacked the de facto complainant with the broken bottle, if released on bail, he may indulge in similar offences, this court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. accordingly, this criminal original petition is dismissed. mpa index:yes/nospeaking/non-speaking orderinternet:yes neutral citation:yes/no to 1.state represented by 2.the public prosecutor, high court of madras. k.rajasekar j. mpa crl op no. 2102 of

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 30-01-2026

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR

1. Ganeshkumar Alias Dhaneshkumar S/o.Balu, No.95, Ramakrishnapuram, Naga Thopu, Vedaranyam Tk, Vedaranyam, Nagapattinam - 614 810. Petitioner(s) Vs

1. State represented by Respondent(s) PRAYER

To enlarge the petitioner/Accused No.1 on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest in Crime No.12 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, and pass such further or other orders as this Honble Court. For Petitioner(s): Gokulakrishnan T For Respondent(s): M/S.J.R.Archana Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

ORDER

The petitioner, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 296(b), 115(2), 118(1) and 351(3) of BNS, in Crime No.12 of 2026, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner demanded

money from the complainant to purchase liquor. When the complainant did not give money, the petitioner attacked him with a broken bottle, causing injuries. Hence, the case has been registered.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner

is ranked as A1 in this case and was also injured in the alleged occurrence. He further submitted that the petitioner is also taking treatment and he is ready to cooperate with the investigation. Therefore, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) appearing for the

respondent police reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that the petitioner is a habitual offender and is already involved in six previous cases, out of which four cases are under 307 IPC. Hence, he opposed the grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

5. Considering the fact that the petitioner is a habitual offender and in this case

he attacked the de facto complainant with the broken bottle, if released on bail, he may indulge in similar offences, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. Mpa Index:Yes/No

Speaking/Non-speaking order

Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No To 1.State represented by 2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. K.RAJASEKAR J. mpa CRL OP No. 2102 of

Same Court & Year Chennai Orders · 2026 Same Parties Ganeshkumar Alias Dhaneshkumar vs State represented by Same Judge Honourable Mr.Justice K.Rajasekar