Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

P.Rani vs the Collector

P.RANI vs The Collector

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Feb 05, 2026
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1415771

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP/3462/2026

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

P.RANI

Respondent

The Collector

Excerpt

.....online application, dated 26.07.2025 as stated supra is considered on merits and in accordance with law, after hearing the objections, if any, from the neighbouring land owners and any other third party, whom the 3rd respondent deems it fit to enquire, within a time frame to be fixed by this court.5. for the foregoing reasons, this court directs the 3rd respondent to pass final orders, on merits and in accordance with law, on the petitioner’s transfer application, dated 26.07.2025 seeking for transfer of page no.3 of 6patta in the name of the petitioner for the property morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition, after hearing the objections, if any, from the neighbouring land owners and any other third party, whom the 3 rd respondent deems it fit to enquire, within a period of twelve (12) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.6. with the above direction, this writ petition is disposed of. no costs. 05.02.2026 index : yes / nospeaking order / non-speaking orderneutral citation case : yes/no sp page no.4 of 6 to 1.the collector, salem collectorate complex, 2.the district revenue officer, salem collectorate, 3.the tashildar, gangavalli taluk, page no.5 of 6abdul quddhose, j.sp 05.02.2026 page no.6 of 6

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 05.02.2026

CORAM :

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE P.Rani ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Collector, Salem Collectorate Complex, 2.The District Revenue Officer, Salem Collectorate, 3.The Tashildar, Gangavalli Taluk, Salem District. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to mutate the patta in petitioner’s name in respect of the property comprised in Survey No.362/2 of Thammampatti Village, Gangavalli Taluk, Salem district ad measuring an extent of 2 acres and 6 cents based on the petitioner’s representation dated 27.12.2025. Page No.1 of 6 For Petitioner : Mr.M.Sundaravadanam For Respondents : Mr.D.Ravichander Special Government Pleader *****

ORDER

This Writ Petition has been filed to direct the respondents to transfer the patta for the property morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition in favour of the petitioner, based on her online application, dated 26.07.2025, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

2. Mr.D.Ravichander, learned Special Government Pleader, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.

3. The petitioner claims that she is the absolute owner of the

subject property and is in possession of the same. She claims that she has acquired the subject property through a court auction sale. Earlier, a direction was issued by this Court in W.P.No.37030 of 2015 to the 3 rd respondent to consider the petitioner’s application seeking for issuance of patta in her name. Since the civil suit was pending, the 3 rd respondent had rejected the petitioner’s application by directing the petitioner to

Page No.2 of 6

approached the civil court. Now, it is stated that the said civil suit has been dismissed and therefore, the 3rd respondent can now issue patta in favour of the petitioner for the property morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition. Therefore, the petitioner had made an online application, dated 26.07.2025 seeking transfer of patta in her name, subsequent to the dismissal of the civil suit filed by a rival claimant. Since the same was not considered till date, the petitioner has filed this writ petition.

4. No prejudice would be caused to the respondents, if the

petitioner’s online application, dated 26.07.2025 as stated supra is considered on merits and in accordance with law, after hearing the objections, if any, from the neighbouring land owners and any other third party, whom the 3rd respondent deems it fit to enquire, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

5. For the foregoing reasons, this Court directs the 3rd respondent to pass final orders, on merits and in accordance with law, on the petitioner’s transfer application, dated 26.07.2025 seeking for transfer of Page No.3 of 6

patta in the name of the petitioner for the property morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition, after hearing the objections, if any, from the neighbouring land owners and any other third party, whom the 3 rd respondent deems it fit to enquire, within a period of twelve (12) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

6. With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. 05.02.2026 Index : Yes / No

Speaking order / Non-speaking order

Neutral Citation Case : Yes/No sp Page No.4 of 6 To 1.The Collector, Salem Collectorate Complex, 2.The District Revenue Officer, Salem Collectorate, 3.The Tashildar, Gangavalli Taluk, Page No.5 of 6

ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.

sp 05.02.2026 Page No.6 of 6

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial