Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

mrs.Latha Vs the Tahsildar

mrs.Latha vs the Tahsildar

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Jan 28, 2026
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1413555

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP/1856/2026

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

mrs.Latha

Respondent

the Tahsildar

Excerpt

.....is dispensed with by this court. page no.2 of 44. no prejudice would be caused to any of the respondents, if thepetitioner’s application seeking for total station survey (machine survey) is considered on merits and in accordance with law, after hearing the objections of the 5th respondent as well as any other third party, whom the 1st respondent deems it fit to enquire, within a time frame to be fixed by this court.5. for the foregoing reasons, this court directs the 1st respondentto conduct the total station survey (machine survey) with the assistance of the senior surveyor for the properties morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition, within a period of twelve (12) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, after hearing the objections, if any, from the 5th respondent and any other third party, whom the 1 st respondent deems it fit to enquire.6. with the aforesaid direction, this writ petition is disposed of. there shall be no order as to costs. index : yes / nospeaking order / non-speaking orderneutral citation case : yes/no sp page no.3 of 4abdul quddhose, j.sp to poonamallee taluk, thiruvallur district. land survey department, thiruvallur district. page no.4 of 4

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 28.01.2026

CORAM :

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE Latha ... Petitioner Vs. Land Survey Department, 5.Prabhu Doss ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to conduct survey and fix four boundaries in respect of the petitioner’s Page No.1 of 4 property comprised in S.Nos.142/1C and 142/1D in Kannapalayam Village, Poonamallee Taluk, Thiruvallur District by acting upon the survey application preferred by the petitioner on 03.08.2025. For Petitioner : Mr.Sharath Chandran For Respondents : Mr.D.Ravichander Special Government Pleader [R1 to R4] Notice dispensed with [R5] *****

ORDER

This Writ Petition has been filed seeking for Total Station Survey (machine survey) by a senior surveyor in order to properly indentify the boundaries of the petitioner’s property.

2. The petitioner had submitted an online application on 03.08.2025 with the official respondents for the said purpose. Since the same has not been considered till date, the petitioner has filed this writ petition.

3. Mr.D.Ravichander, learned Special Government Pleader,

accepts notice on behalf of the respondents 1 to 4. Since no adverse order

has been passed against the 5th respondent in this writ petition, notice to the 5th respondent is dispensed with by this Court. Page No.2 of 4

4. No prejudice would be caused to any of the respondents, if the

petitioner’s application seeking for Total Station Survey (machine survey) is considered on merits and in accordance with law, after hearing the objections of the 5th respondent as well as any other third party, whom the 1st respondent deems it fit to enquire, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

5. For the foregoing reasons, this Court directs the 1st respondent

to conduct the Total Station Survey (machine survey) with the assistance of the senior surveyor for the properties morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition, within a period of twelve (12) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, after hearing the objections, if any, from the 5th respondent and any other third party, whom the 1 st respondent deems it fit to enquire.

6. With the aforesaid direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. Index : Yes / No

Speaking order / Non-speaking order

Neutral Citation Case : Yes/No sp Page No.3 of 4

ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.

sp To Poonamallee Taluk, Thiruvallur District. Land Survey Department, Thiruvallur District. Page No.4 of 4

Continue Your Research

Same Court & Year Chennai · 2026 Same Parties mrs.Latha vs the Tahsildar Same Judge Honourable Mr Justice Abdul Quddhose

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales