Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

Rama Nathan vs Ganesh Kumar

Rama Nathan vs Ganesh Kumar

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided May 25, 2023
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1404650

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
OP(C)/2380/2022

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Rama Nathan

Respondent

Ganesh Kumar

Excerpt

.....true copy of the impleading petition ie., i.a. no. 1/2021 in o.s. 1814/2012 filed before munsiff court-iii, thiruvananthapuram exhibit p3 true copy of the order dated 14.2.2022 in i.a. no. 1/2021 in o.s. 1814/2012 passed by the munsiff court-iii, thiruvananthapuram exhibit p4 true copy of the delay petition filed by the respondents/plaintiffs, ie i.a. 3/2022 filed exhibit p5 true copy of the petition to set aside the abatement of suit, ie i.a. 4/2022 filed exhibit p6 true copy of the petition to implead legal heirs of the 2nd defendant, ie i.a. 2/2022 filed before the munsiff court-iii, exhibit p7 true copy of the objection to the petition for condonation of delay filed by the exhibit p8 true copy of the objection to the petition to set aside the abatement of suit filed by the exhibit p9 true copy of the objection to the petition toimplead legal heirs of the 2nd defendant, filed by the petitioner/defendants before the munsiff court-iii, thiruvananthapuram op(c) no.2380 of 2022 4 exhibit p10 true copy of the order dated 18.7.2022 in i.a. no. 3/2022 in o.s. no. 1814/2012 passed exhibit p11 true copy of the order dated 18.7.2022 in i.a. no. 4/2022 in o.s. no. 1814/2012 passed // true copy // p.a. to judge

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN THURSDAY, THE 25th DAY OF MAY 2023 / 4TH JYAISHTA, 1945 OP(C) NO. 2380 OF 2022 AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 18.07.2022 IN IA 03/2022 AND IA 04/2022 IN OS 1814/2012 OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF COURT-III, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM PETITIONER/3rd DEFENDANT:

RAMA NATHAN, AGED 65 YEARS, S/o V.V SUBRAMANIAM, 18/1883(1), JAI NAGAR, JRA-409, BY ADVS. S.JATHIN DAS G.S.SANAL KUMAR T.A.PRAKASH S.SOUMYA ISSAC RESPONDENTS/PLAINTIFFS & DEFENDANTS 1 & 4: 1 GANESH KUMAR, AGED 53 YEARS, VIJAYALAYAM, T.C 18/1879, THIRUMALA P.O, 2 MAYA, AGED 48 YEARS, W/o GANESH KUMAR, RESIDING AT VIJAYALAYAM, T.C 18/1879, THIRUMALA P.O, 3 LEKHA, TC 18/1883(2), JRA-407, JAI NAGAR, 4 K. PRABHAKARAN NAIR, TC 18/1883(3), JRA-407, JAI NAGAR, BY ADV S.SOUMYA ISSAC THIS OP (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25.05.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: OP(C) No.2380 of 2022 2

JUDGMENT

When the matter came up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submitted that he is not pressing the petition, presumably on the reason that there is no substance in the matter. Hence, the original petition is dismissed as not pressed. Sd/- P.SOMARAJAN JUDGE DMR/- OP(C) No.2380 of 2022 3 APPENDIX OF OP(C) 2380/2022 PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE AMENDED PLAINT IN O.S. Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE IMPLEADING PETITION ie., I.A. NO. 1/2021 IN O.S. 1814/2012 FILED BEFORE MUNSIFF COURT-III, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 14.2.2022 IN I.A. NO. 1/2021 IN O.S. 1814/2012 PASSED BY THE MUNSIFF COURT-III, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM Exhibit P4 TRUE COPY OF THE DELAY PETITION FILED BY THE RESPONDENTS/PLAINTIFFS, ie I.A. 3/2022 FILED Exhibit P5 TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION TO SET ASIDE THE ABATEMENT OF SUIT, ie I.A. 4/2022 FILED Exhibit P6 TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION TO IMPLEAD LEGAL HEIRS OF THE 2ND DEFENDANT, ie I.A. 2/2022 FILED BEFORE THE MUNSIFF COURT-III, Exhibit P7 TRUE COPY OF THE OBJECTION TO THE PETITION FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY FILED BY THE Exhibit P8 TRUE COPY OF THE OBJECTION TO THE PETITION TO SET ASIDE THE ABATEMENT OF SUIT FILED BY THE Exhibit P9 TRUE COPY OF THE OBJECTION TO THE PETITION TO

IMPLEAD LEGAL HEIRS OF THE 2ND DEFENDANT, FILED BY THE PETITIONER/DEFENDANTS BEFORE THE MUNSIFF COURT-III, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM OP(C) No.2380 of 2022 4 Exhibit P10 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 18.7.2022 IN I.A. NO. 3/2022 IN O.S. NO. 1814/2012 PASSED Exhibit P11 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 18.7.2022 IN I.A. NO. 4/2022 IN O.S. NO. 1814/2012 PASSED // TRUE COPY // P.A. TO JUDGE

Continue Your Research

Same Court & Year Kerala Orders · 2023 Same Parties Rama Nathan vs Ganesh Kumar Same Judge Honourable Mr. Justice P.Somarajan
high court legal heir set aside True copy

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales