Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Collector of C. Ex. Vs. Elcom Precision Electronics Pvt.

Collector of C. Ex. vs Elcom Precision Electronics Pvt.

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi Decided Jul 29, 1998
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/13988

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided On
Subject
MRTP

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

MRTP

Key legal issue
MRTP

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Collector of C. Ex.

Respondent

Elcom Precision Electronics Pvt.

Legal References

Reported In
(1999)(108)ELT166TriDel

Excerpt

1. this appeal of the revenue is directed against the order-in-appeal no. gsm-308/90 b. iii, dated 28-3-1990 allowing exemption under notification no. 160/86 in respect of 'actuators'. the aforesaid notification denies exemption to switches. the impugned order holds that 'actuator' in question is not switches and they are not commercially known as switches. the order also states that technically also they are not switches, though no reason for the finding has been given.2. the revenue has challenged the order on the ground that explanatory notes in harmonised commodity description and coding system (page 1389) clarify that push button switches are classifiable as 'switches'.revenue also submits that the collector has committed an error in holding that the goods are not in commercial parlance 'switches'.3. learned dr reiterated the contentions made in the appeal. he drew attention in particular to the explanatory notes. when the case was called no one represented the respondent.4. we have perused the records of the case and have considered the submissions. we find that the assessee in the classification list had described the goods as "electrical push buttons various varieties (below 1000 volts)". we also note that the explanatory notes mentioned push button switches as classifiable under switches. the collector has given a purely literal meaning to the concept of commercial identity by holding that the goods are not switches because they are not so called.the product in question is called 'push snap-action snap-on push buttons' in the literature of the appellant. it performs the function of switches. therefore,, there is no basis for holding that the product in question is not known and dealt with in commercial parlance as switches. accordingly, the appeal succeeds and is allowed. the impugned order is set aside with consequential relief to the revenue.

Full Judgment

1. This appeal of the Revenue is directed against the Order-in-Appeal No. GSM-308/90 B. III, dated 28-3-1990 allowing exemption under Notification No. 160/86 in respect of 'actuators'. The aforesaid notification denies exemption to switches. The impugned order holds that 'actuator' in question is not switches and they are not commercially known as switches. The order also states that technically also they are not switches, though no reason for the finding has been given.

2. The Revenue has challenged the order on the ground that Explanatory Notes in Harmonised Commodity Description and Coding System (page 1389) clarify that push button switches are classifiable as 'switches'.

Revenue also submits that the Collector has committed an error in holding that the goods are not in commercial parlance 'switches'.

3. Learned DR reiterated the contentions made in the appeal. He drew attention in particular to the Explanatory Notes. When the case was called no one represented the respondent.

4. We have perused the records of the case and have considered the submissions. We find that the assessee in the classification list had described the goods as "Electrical Push Buttons various varieties (below 1000 volts)". We also note that the Explanatory Notes mentioned push button switches as classifiable under switches. The Collector has given a purely literal meaning to the concept of commercial identity by holding that the goods are not switches because they are not so called.

The product in question is called 'push snap-action snap-on push buttons' in the literature of the appellant. It performs the function of switches. Therefore,, there is no basis for holding that the product in question is not known and dealt with in commercial parlance as switches. Accordingly, the appeal succeeds and is allowed. The impugned order is set aside with consequential relief to the Revenue.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial