Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Bharati Bhattacharjee Vs. Debotosh Bhattacharjee

Bharati Bhattacharjee vs Debotosh Bhattacharjee

Disposition Revision petition allowed Court Guwahati Decided Dec 19, 2002
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/139487

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Guwahati High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Civil Revision No. 431 of 1997
Subject
;Family;Civil
Disposition
Revision petition allowed

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

-

Key legal issue
;Family;Civil
Outcome / disposition
Revision petition allowed
Acts & sections
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 24

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Bharati Bhattacharjee

Advocate M. Nath, Adv.

Respondent

Debotosh Bhattacharjee

Advocate None

Legal References

Excerpt

- .....transfer of the divorce proceeding made by the wife on the ground that the apex court in the case of archana rastogi v. rakesh rastogi, reported in 2000 (10) scc 350 has laid down the law that the financial difficulties as well as poor health of the wife are the adequate grounds which can by taken note of by the court while deciding the question of transfer of proceedings of divorce. 5. the grounds pleaded in the present petition are that the petitioner has no regular income of her own and that her present financial resources does not enable her to conduct and contest the proceeding in shilling. the affliction of bronchial problems is another ground on which the petitioner contends that the divorce proceedings may be transferred to the court at guwahati. following the decision of the apex court rendered in the case of archana rastogi (supra) and having regard to the fact that the application for transfer is not opposed, i am inclined to hold that the petitioner has made out a case for invocation of power for transfer vested in this court under section 24 of the code of civil procedure. 6. accordingly, the revision petition is allowed. the divorce proceedingregistered as divorce suit no. 5(h) of 1997, new pending in the courtof learned district judge, east khasi hills district at shilling shallstand transferred to the family court at guwahati.

Full Judgment

Ranjan Gogoi, J.

1. By this application under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, the petitioner-wife seeks the transfer of the proceedings registered as Divorce Suit No. 5(H) of 1997 pending before the learned District Judge, East Khasi. Hills District at Shilling. The aforesaid proceeding for divorce has been instituted before the learned District Judge at Shilling by the respondent-bus band. It may be noticed herein that the petitioner seeks transfer of the said proceeding from the Court at shilling of the Family Court at Cuwahati as she is residing at Guwahati.

2. The grounds on which the transfer of the present divorce suit has been sought are that the petitioner, apart from, having a 17 year-old son has no male member in her family to look after her. She is living at Guwahati with her aged and ailing mother and as she has no regular source of income, it would not be possible for her to go to Shilling for conducting the case and also to take her witnesses of Shilling for examination in the proceeding in question. The petitioner has further averred that she is suffering from acute bronchial problems and she has been advised by her doctor not to visit any high altitude station.

3. The application for transfer is net opposed. Though the notices have been served, the respondent has chosen not to contest the proceeding.

4. Mr. M. Nath, learned counsel for the petitioner has relied on a judgment of this court in the case of Sikha Paul Choudhury v. Dilip Paul Choudhury, reported in 2002 (2) GLT 599 in support of the grounds on which the transfer has been sought. In the case of Sikha Paul Choudhury (supra), this Court has allowed the prayer for transfer of the divorce proceeding made by the wife on the ground that the Apex Court in the case of Archana Rastogi v. Rakesh Rastogi, reported in 2000 (10) SCC 350 has laid down the law that the financial difficulties as well as poor health of the wife are the adequate grounds which can by taken note of by the Court while deciding the question of transfer of proceedings of divorce.

5. The grounds pleaded in the present petition are that the petitioner has no regular income of her own and that her present financial resources does not enable her to conduct and contest the proceeding in Shilling. The affliction of bronchial problems is another ground on which the petitioner contends that the divorce proceedings may be transferred to the Court at Guwahati. Following the decision of the Apex Court rendered in the case of Archana Rastogi (supra) and having regard to the fact that the application for transfer is not opposed, I am inclined to hold that the petitioner has made out a case for invocation of power for transfer vested in this Court under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

6. Accordingly, the revision petition is allowed. The divorce proceeding

registered as Divorce Suit No. 5(H) of 1997, new pending in the Court

of learned District Judge, East Khasi Hills District at Shilling shall

stand transferred to the Family Court at Guwahati.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial