Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

The Manager vs the State of Kerala

The Manager vs The State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Feb 01, 2023
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1385913

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP(C)/14788/2016

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

The Manager

Respondent

The State of Kerala

Excerpt

.....w.p.(c) no. 14788 of 2016 ============================================================= dated this the 1st day of february, 2023judgmentthe above writ petition is filed with following prayers: “(i) issue a writ of mandamus or other appropriate writ sanction upto vth standard in the petitioner school from the academic year 2015-2016 onwards.(ii) issue a writ of mandamus or other appropriate writ effectively consider and pass appropriate orders upon exhibit p-1 after affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner within a time limit(iii) pass such other order or direction which this hon'ble court may deem fit and proper to grant in the circumstances of the case.” (sic)2. the main prayer in this writ petition is to issueappropriate direction commanding the 1st respondent to sanction upto vth standard in the petitioner school from the academic year 2015-16 onwards. this writ petition is pending before this court from 2016 onwards. no interim order is passed in this case. -3- probably, the prayers in this writ petition might have been infructuous. if there is any surviving grievance to the petitioner, the petitioner is free to approach the 1 st respondent with appropriate representation and if any such representation is received, the 1st respondent will do the needful, in accordance to law. with the above observation, this writ petition is closed. sd/- p.v.kunhikrishnan judge das -4- appendix of wp(c) 14788/2016 petitioner exhibits p1 true copy of the application for upgradation of petitioner's school dt 5/4/16 p2 true copy of the judgment in wpc no. 25623/11 dt. 11/5/14

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN WEDNESDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF FEBRUARY 2023 / 12TH MAGHA, 1944 WP(C) NO. 14788 OF 2016 PETITIONER/S: THE MANAGER AGED 59 YEARS SASTHA A.L.P. SCHOOL, PO. PUDUPPALLY,TIRUR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT BY ADVS. SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED SMT.P.A.JENZIA RESPONDENT/S: 1 THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENTGENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIATTHIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001 2 THE DIRECTOR OF PYUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS JAGATHY, THIRUVANTHAPURAM-695014 3 THE ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER TIRUR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT-676101 OTHER PRESENT: SRI.K.M.FAISAL, GP THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01.02.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: -2-

P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J.

====================================================== W.P.(C) No. 14788 of 2016 ============================================================= Dated this the 1st day of February, 2023

JUDGMENT

The above writ petition is filed with following prayers: “(i) issue a writ of mandamus or other appropriate writ sanction upto Vth Standard in the Petitioner School from the academic year 2015-2016 onwards.

(ii) issue a writ of mandamus or other appropriate writ effectively consider and pass appropriate orders upon Exhibit P-1 after affording an opportunity of being heard to the Petitioner within a time limit

(iii) pass such other order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper to grant in the circumstances of the case.” (sic)

2. The main prayer in this writ petition is to issue

appropriate direction commanding the 1st respondent to sanction upto Vth standard in the petitioner school from the academic year 2015-16 onwards. This writ petition is pending before this Court from 2016 onwards. No interim order is passed in this case. -3- Probably, the prayers in this writ petition might have been infructuous. If there is any surviving grievance to the petitioner, the petitioner is free to approach the 1 st respondent with appropriate representation and if any such representation is received, the 1st respondent will do the needful, in accordance to law. With the above observation, this writ petition is closed. sd/- P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN JUDGE das -4- APPENDIX OF WP(C) 14788/2016 PETITIONER EXHIBITS P1 TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR UPGRADATION OF PETITIONER'S SCHOOL DT 5/4/16 P2 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WPC NO. 25623/11 DT. 11/5/14

Continue Your Research

Same Court & Year Kerala · 2023 Same Parties The Manager vs The State of Kerala Same Judge Honourable Mr. Justice P.V.Kunhikrishnan

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales