Liva Pharma Ltd. Vs. Cce

Liva Pharma Ltd. vs Cce

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai Decided Jun 30, 1998

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/13762

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/13762
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Judge: U Bhat, S T K.
Decided On: Jun 30, 1998
Subject: Service Tax

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Service Tax

Key legal issue: Service Tax

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Liva Pharma Ltd.

Advocate Shri. Sandeep Mittal

Respondent

Cce

Legal References

Reported In: (1999)(80)LC728Tri(Mum.)bai

Excerpt

1. orders-in-appeal no. kps/648/b. 11/91 dated 10.4.1991 and sdk/280-281/b. 11/91 dated 12.11.1991 both passed by the collector (appeals) central excise, bombay, setting aside the original orders passed by the assistant collector and remanding the cases to the assistant collector for de novo consideration after observing principles of natural justice have been challenged in these appeals.2. shri sandeep mittal, learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the appellant is not pursuing the appeals and would be satisfied if the assistant collector re-adjudicates the matter without further delay.3. appellant's main grievance appears to be that the assistant collector has not taken action during the last six years. appeals are disposed of directing the jurisdictional adjudicating authority to take up the matter at hand for adjudication and pass adjudication orders after granting due opportunity to the appellant.

Full Judgment

1. Orders-in-Appeal No. KPS/648/B. 11/91 dated 10.4.1991 and SDK/280-281/B. 11/91 dated 12.11.1991 both passed by the Collector (Appeals) Central Excise, Bombay, setting aside the original orders passed by the Assistant Collector and remanding the cases to the Assistant Collector for de novo consideration after observing principles of natural justice have been challenged in these appeals.

2. Shri Sandeep Mittal, Learned Counsel for the appellant submitted that the appellant is not pursuing the appeals and would be satisfied if the Assistant Collector re-adjudicates the matter without further delay.

3. Appellant's main grievance appears to be that the Assistant Collector has not taken action during the last six years. Appeals are disposed of directing the jurisdictional adjudicating authority to take up the matter at hand for adjudication and pass adjudication orders after granting due opportunity to the appellant.

Same Court & Year Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumb... Same Parties Liva Pharma Ltd. vs Cce Same Subject Service Tax Same Judge U Bhat, S T K.

Service Tax Adjudicating authority Natural justice de novo take up E la