Sital Ram Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Sital Ram vs State of Bihar and ors.

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided May 03, 2001

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/136076

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/136076
Court: Patna High Court
Judge: Radha Mohan Prasad, J.
Decided On: May 03, 2001
Case Number: G.W.J.C. No. 5392 of 2001
Subject: ;Service

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Service law - Post-retiral dues--Claim relating to--As agreed and as per direction of High Court in the cases of Mostt. Rukmini Devi and Dr. Ganganand Jha, held, petitioner may file his claim before authority concerned--To be considered and disposed of by said authority as per said directions--In case of default, co...

Key legal issue: ;Service

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sital Ram

Respondent

State of Bihar and ors.

Excerpt

service law - post-retiral dues--claim relating to--as agreed and as per direction of high court in the cases of mostt. rukmini devi and dr. ganganand jha, held, petitioner may file his claim before authority concerned--to be considered and disposed of by said authority as per said directions--in case of default, concerned authority shall not draw his salary, etc. and also to pay a cost of rs. 1,000/- from his pocket to petitioner. - radha mohan prasad, j.1. keeping in view the general direction of this court with respect to the claim relating to post-retiral dues, as agreed, the writ petition is disposed of in terms of the general direction of this court given in the case of mostt. rukmini devi v. the state of bihar reported in 1996(2) pljr 348, read with another general direction of this court given in the case of dr. ganganand jha v. the lalit narayan mithila university and ors. reported in 1997(1) blj 93.2. the petitioner may file his claim in detail before the authority concerned along with a copy of this order and the aforementioned general directions of this court which shall be considered and disposed of by the said authority strictly in terms of the said general directions and within the time fixed therein, failing which the concerned authority shall not draw his salary and other allowances and shall also be li,able to pay a cost of rs. 1,000 (one thousand) to the petitioner from his own pocket.

Full Judgment

Radha Mohan Prasad, J.

1. Keeping in view the general direction of this Court with respect to the claim relating to post-retiral dues, as agreed, the writ petition is disposed of in terms of the general direction of this Court given in the case of Mostt. Rukmini Devi v. The State of Bihar reported in 1996(2) PLJR 348, read with another general direction of this Court given in the case of Dr. Ganganand Jha v. The Lalit Narayan Mithila University and Ors. reported in 1997(1) BLJ 93.

2. The petitioner may file his claim in detail before the authority concerned along with a copy of this order and the aforementioned general directions of this Court which shall be considered and disposed of by the said authority strictly in terms of the said general directions and within the time fixed therein, failing which the concerned authority shall not draw his salary and other allowances and shall also be li,able to pay a cost of Rs. 1,000 (one thousand) to the petitioner from his own pocket.

Same Court & Year Patna · 2001 Same Parties Sital Ram vs State of Bihar and ors. Same Subject ;Service Same Judge Radha Mohan Prasad, J.

;Service