Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Anuraj vs State of Kerala

Anuraj vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Aug 04, 2023
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1358075

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Bail Appl./3460/2023

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Anuraj

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr.justice ziyad rahman a.a. friday, the 4th day of august 2023 / 13th sravana, 1945 bail appl. no. 3460 of 2023 crime no.363/2023 of ottappalam police station petitioners/accused nos.1 to 3: 1 anuraj aged 33 years 2 jinuraj aged 27 years 3 sinuraj aged 26 years by advs. nikita j. mendez p.m.rafiq m.revikrishnan ajeesh k.sasi sruthy n. bhat rahul sunil sruthy k.k p.vijaya bhanu (sr.)respondent/complainant: state of kerala represented by public prosecutor,high court of kerala, pin - 682031 smt.s.seetha-sr.pp this bail application having come up for admission on 04.08.2023, the court on the same day delivered the following: :2 :orderdated this the 4th day of august, 2023 this application for anticipatory bail is submitted by the petitioners as they apprehend arrest in connection with the investigation of crime no.363/2023 of ottapalam police station.2. today, when the matter came up for consideration, thelearned public prosecutor upon instructions submitted that, even though, initially the crime was registered for the offences punishable under sections 341, 323, 324, 294(b) and 308 read with section 34 of the indian penal code, during the course of investigation, the offence under sections 324 and 308 were deleted. thus it is seen that now the offences are bailable in nature. therefore, no orders are necessary in this case. accordingly, this application is closed recording the above submission and without prejudice to the rights and remedies of the petitioners. sd/- ziyad rahman a.a. judge ncd :3 : appendix of bail appl. 3460/2023 petitioner annexures annexure a true copy of the fir registered in crime no. 363/2023 of ottappalam annexure b true copy of the fir registered in crime no. 365/2023 of ottappalam

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A. FRIDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF AUGUST 2023 / 13TH SRAVANA, 1945 BAIL APPL. NO. 3460 OF 2023 CRIME NO.363/2023 OF OTTAPPALAM POLICE STATION PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NOS.1 TO 3: 1 ANURAJ AGED 33 YEARS 2 JINURAJ AGED 27 YEARS 3 SINURAJ AGED 26 YEARS BY ADVS. NIKITA J. MENDEZ P.M.RAFIQ M.REVIKRISHNAN AJEESH K.SASI SRUTHY N. BHAT RAHUL SUNIL SRUTHY K.K P.VIJAYA BHANU (SR.)

RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT: STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF KERALA, PIN - 682031 SMT.S.SEETHA-SR.PP THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04.08.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: :2 :

ORDER

Dated this the 4th day of August, 2023 This application for anticipatory bail is submitted by the petitioners as they apprehend arrest in connection with the investigation of crime No.363/2023 of Ottapalam Police Station.

2. Today, when the matter came up for consideration, the

learned Public Prosecutor upon instructions submitted that, even though, initially the crime was registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 294(b) and 308 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, during the course of investigation, the offence under Sections 324 and 308 were deleted. Thus it is seen that now the offences are bailable in nature. Therefore, no orders are necessary in this case. Accordingly, this application is closed recording the above submission and without prejudice to the rights and remedies of the petitioners. Sd/- ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A. JUDGE ncd :3 : APPENDIX OF BAIL APPL. 3460/2023 PETITIONER ANNEXURES Annexure A TRUE COPY OF THE FIR REGISTERED IN CRIME NO. 363/2023 OF OTTAPPALAM Annexure B TRUE COPY OF THE FIR REGISTERED IN CRIME NO. 365/2023 OF OTTAPPALAM

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial