Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Krishnan vs Vally

Krishnan vs VALLY

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Jun 30, 2023
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1358027

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
RSA/942/2006

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Krishnan

Respondent

VALLY

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr.justice c. jayachandran friday, the 30th day of june 2023 / 9th ashadha, 1945 against the order/judgmentas 155/2003 of district court & sessions court,thrissur os 737/1999 of munsiff court, vadakkancherry appellant: krishnan s/o.parakulangara tharayil,, melepurathuveettil r chamy naidu, pattiparambu, desom, thiruvillwamala village,, by adv sri.g.sreekumar (chelur) respondents: 1 vally puthenveettil krishnan, thiruvillwamala village,, pattiparambu desom, talappilly taluk. 2 shanmughan aged 50 employed in railway, s/o.late krishnan,, 3 radhakrishnan so.ist appellant 4 sivamany do.ist appellant 5 prema sivadas do.ist appellant by adv sri.p.k.madhusoodanan this regular second appeal having come up for admission on 30.06.2023, the court on the same day delivered the following:judgmentdated this the 30th day of june, 2023 when this matter was taken up for consideration on the last posting date, learned counsel for the respondent submitted that the matter has been settled amicably by and between the parties out of the court. on that day, learned counsel for the appellant sought for time to ascertain the factum of settlement. thereafter, the matter was posted on two occasions, including today. today also, learned counsel for the appellant submitted that he could not succeed in getting any instructions from the appellant as regards the settlement. in this circumstances, this appeal will stand disposed of settled, as claimed by the counsel for the respondent. sd/- c. jayachandran judge nsd

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C. JAYACHANDRAN FRIDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF JUNE 2023 / 9TH ASHADHA, 1945 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENTAS 155/2003 OF DISTRICT COURT & SESSIONS COURT,THRISSUR OS 737/1999 OF MUNSIFF COURT, VADAKKANCHERRY APPELLANT: KRISHNAN S/O.PARAKULANGARA THARAYIL,, MELEPURATHUVEETTIL R CHAMY NAIDU, PATTIPARAMBU, DESOM, THIRUVILLWAMALA VILLAGE,, BY ADV SRI.G.SREEKUMAR (CHELUR) RESPONDENTS: 1 VALLY PUTHENVEETTIL KRISHNAN, THIRUVILLWAMALA VILLAGE,, PATTIPARAMBU DESOM, TALAPPILLY TALUK. 2 SHANMUGHAN AGED 50 EMPLOYED IN RAILWAY, S/O.LATE KRISHNAN,, 3 RADHAKRISHNAN SO.IST APPELLANT 4 SIVAMANY DO.IST APPELLANT 5 PREMA SIVADAS DO.IST APPELLANT BY ADV SRI.P.K.MADHUSOODANAN THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30.06.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT

Dated this the 30th day of June, 2023 When this matter was taken up for consideration on the last posting date, learned counsel for the respondent submitted that the matter has been settled amicably by and between the parties out of the Court. On that day, learned Counsel for the appellant sought for time to ascertain the factum of settlement. Thereafter, the matter was posted on two occasions, including today. Today also, learned Counsel for the appellant submitted that he could not succeed in getting any instructions from the appellant as regards the settlement. In this circumstances, this appeal will stand disposed of settled, as claimed by the Counsel for the respondent. sd/- C. JAYACHANDRAN JUDGE Nsd

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial