Full Judgment
3. The departmental representative contends that the products have been rendered suitable for use by consumers as a result of and thus as a result of manufacturing process and generally adopts the reasonings in the order of the Collector (Appeals).
4. The notice issued to the appellant does not indicate the basis for process undertaken amounted to manufacture of a new product. No such reason is present in the order of the Assistant Collector or Collector (Appeals). The burden of establishing that the process amounted to manufacture has not been discharged by the Department.
5. Further the process does not seem to amount to manufacture on the face of it. The dyes manufactured by the appellant are now classifiable under Chapter 32.04 of the tariff. This chapter contains a note for products of heading 34.06 other colouring matter. Heading 32.04 contains specific sub Headings for pigment or dyes in unformulated unstandarised and unprepared forms (for example wet cakes or press cakes) of S.O. dyes into their formulated/standardised or prepared forms ready for use in the process of dyeing would amount to manufacture and that mere repacking or relabelling of duty paid dyes would not amount to manufacture where no new product emerges. These views of the present tariff lays support to the view that such blending of dyes does not amount to manufacture. In any event as we have noted in the absence of any evidence or market inquiries to show that the different product has emerged, the contention that the goods are as a result of manufacture is without substance.