Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Amlawati Devi Vs. the State of Bihar and anr.

Amlawati Devi vs The State of Bihar and anr.

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided Feb 25, 2003
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/130545

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Patna High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
L.P.A. No. 242 of 2002
Subject
;Service

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Service laws - Family Pension--Second wife--Entitlement Of--If a Government employee married second wife during the life time of his first wife, the second wife would not be entitled for pension but the minor children born from her would be entitled. - - 3. Law on this point is well settled.

Key legal issue
;Service
Acts & sections
Service Law

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Amlawati Devi

Advocate Shashi Bhushan Singh, Adv.

Respondent

The State of Bihar and anr.

Advocate Pankaj Kumar, Adv. for Respondent No. 6Ranjit Sinha, JC to SC 3

Legal References

Acts
Service Law

Excerpt

service laws - family pension--second wife--entitlement of--if a government employee married second wife during the life time of his first wife, the second wife would not be entitled for pension but the minor children born from her would be entitled. - - 3. law on this point is well settled......of the central government, according to which, if a government employee married second wife during the life time of his first wife, in that case, the second wife will not be entitled for pension but the minor children born from her will be entitled to family pension, meaning thereby that after attaining majority they will not get family pension. 5. the apex court also in the case of rameshwari devi v. state of bihar, 2000(1) supreme 385, has held that the second marriage during the life time of first wife is void under the provisions of hindu marriage act but the children of second void marriage are legitimate and are entitled to share family pension and death-cum-retirement gratuity along with wife and children of first marriage, but they would be entitled to family pension only till they attain majority and the second wife would not be entitled to anything. 6. thus, no case for interference with the order of the impugned order is made out. however, it is made clear that if the second wife has minor children, then they will be entitled to family pension till they attain majority. if document is produced before the authority regarding the minor children of the appellant second wife, then payment shall be made to them in accordance with law. 7. with the aforesaid observation, this appeal stands disposed of.

Full Judgment

Nagendra Rai and Rajendra Prasad, JJ.

1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties.

2. This appeal is directed against the order dated 8-1-2002 passed by the learned single Judge in CWJC No. 5864 of 2000, whereby he has held that the second wife is not entitled to family pension.

3. Law on this point is well settled. According to the Government instruction vide Memo No. Pen-103/64-9505-F dated 3-10-1964 as amended upto 1967, when a Government employee is survived by more than one widow, the pension will be paid to them in equal where and on the death of a widow her share of the pension will become payable to her eligible minor child and if at the time of her death, a widow leaves no eligible minor child, the payment of her share of the pension will cases.

4. The said provision has been amended in 1996 by Memo No. PC -1-Misc. 41/ 92/10056 dated 6-9-1996 on the pattern of the provisions made applicable in the base of the employees of the Central Government, according to which, if a Government employee married second wife during the life time of his first wife, in that case, the second wife will not be entitled for pension but the minor children born from her will be entitled to family pension, meaning thereby that after attaining majority they will not get family pension.

5. The apex Court also in the case of Rameshwari Devi v. State of Bihar, 2000(1) Supreme 385, has held that the second marriage during the life time of first wife is void under the provisions of Hindu Marriage Act but the children of second void marriage are legitimate and are entitled to share family pension and death-cum-retirement gratuity along with wife and children of first marriage, but they would be entitled to family pension only till they attain majority and the second wife would not be entitled to anything.

6. Thus, no case for interference with the order of the impugned order is made out. However, it is made clear that if the second wife has minor children, then they will be entitled to family pension till they attain majority. If document is produced before the authority regarding the minor children of the appellant second wife, then payment shall be made to them in accordance with law.

7. With the aforesaid observation, this appeal stands disposed of.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial