Muhammed Baseeth vs Shereena

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Mar 13, 2024

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1296125

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1296125
Court: Kerala Orders High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr. Justice P.Somarajan
Decided On: Mar 13, 2024
Case Number: RPFC/320/2023

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Muhammed Baseeth

Respondent

Shereena

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice p.somarajan wednesday, the 13th day of march 2024 / 23rd phalguna, 1945 against the order/judgment dated in mc no.229 of 2018 of family court, palakkad revision petitioner/counter petitioner: muhammed baseeth aged 38 years s/o. abdul azeez, r/a thazhathepeediyakka veedu, mangalam dam vilage, alathur taluk., pin - 678706basil mathew aaromal thulasi respondents/petitioners: 1 shereena aged 32 years d/o. kammukutty, bismilla manzil, alathur taluk, pin - 678706 *2 ameen muhammed aged 14 years (minor),(corrected) bismilla manzil, alathur taluk -678706 *3 ayan muhammed aged 9 years (minor), bismilla manzil, (corrected) alathur taluk-678706 * 2nd and 3rd minor respondents are represented by 1st respondent, as per the order dated abraham samson lovely samson(k/86-a/1999) this rev.petition(family court) having come up for admission on 13.03.2024, the court on the same day delivered the following:orderthe revision petitioner and the counsel remained absent. there was no representation. the counsel for the respondent is present in person and ready with the matter. it is against the order of maintenance the husband came up. this would show what is behind it. hence, the absence of the counsel cannot be condoned. the rpfc will stand dismissed for non- prosecution. sd/- p.somarajan judge spv

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN WEDNESDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF MARCH 2024 / 23RD PHALGUNA, 1945 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED IN MC NO.229 OF 2018 OF FAMILY COURT, PALAKKAD REVISION PETITIONER/COUNTER PETITIONER: MUHAMMED BASEETH AGED 38 YEARS S/O. ABDUL AZEEZ, R/A THAZHATHEPEEDIYAKKA VEEDU, MANGALAM DAM VILAGE, ALATHUR TALUK., PIN - 678706
BASIL MATHEW AAROMAL THULASI RESPONDENTS/PETITIONERS: 1 SHEREENA AGED 32 YEARS D/O. KAMMUKUTTY, BISMILLA MANZIL, ALATHUR TALUK, PIN - 678706 *2 AMEEN MUHAMMED AGED 14 YEARS (MINOR),(CORRECTED) BISMILLA MANZIL, ALATHUR TALUK -678706 *3 AYAN MUHAMMED AGED 9 YEARS (MINOR), BISMILLA MANZIL, (CORRECTED) ALATHUR TALUK-678706 * 2ND AND 3RD MINOR RESPONDENTS ARE REPRESENTED BY 1ST RESPONDENT, AS PER THE ORDER DATED ABRAHAM SAMSON LOVELY SAMSON(K/86-A/1999) THIS REV.PETITION(FAMILY COURT) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13.03.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

ORDER

The revision petitioner and the counsel remained absent. There was no representation. The counsel for the respondent is present in person and ready with the matter. It is against the order of maintenance the husband came up. This would show what is behind it. Hence, the absence of the counsel cannot be condoned. The RPFC will stand dismissed for non- prosecution. Sd/- P.SOMARAJAN JUDGE SPV

Same Court & Year Kerala Orders · 2024 Same Parties Muhammed Baseeth vs Shereena Same Judge Honourable Mr. Justice P.Somarajan