Sheena vs Muhammad Suneer

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Apr 12, 2024

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1289066

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1289066
Court: Kerala Orders High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr. Justice P.Somarajan
Decided On: Apr 12, 2024
Case Number: Crl.Rev.Pet/368/2023
Subject: Right to Information

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Right to Information

Key legal issue: Right to Information

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sheena

Respondent

Muhammad Suneer

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice p.somarajan friday, the 12th day of april 2024 / 23rd chaithra, 1946 crl.rev.pet no. 368 of 2023 against the judgment dated 28.06.2019 in crl.appeal no.23/2019 of additional sessions court, mananthavady arising out of thejudgment dated 28.02.2019 in st no.349 of 2014 of judicialmagistrate of first class-i, mananthavady petitioner/appellant/accused: sheena, aged 32 years, d/o ammu, kallittamkuzhi veedu, anchukunnu. p.o., mananthavady taluk, wayanad, pin - 670645 by advs. shakthi prakash k.dhruv kumar harikrishnan m.s. respondents/respondents/complainant: 1 muhammad suneer, aged 39 years, s/o assainar, poovathankandi house, panamaram p.o & village, mananthavady taluk, wayanad, pin - 670721 2 state of kerala, rep. by the public prosecutor, high court of kerala, ernakulam, pin - 682031 by public prosecutor sri sangeetharaj n r this criminal revision petition having come up for admission on 12.04.2024, the court on the same day passed the following: crl.r.p.no.368 of 2023 2orderwhen the matter came up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submitted that the accused was already arrested on 10.04.2024 and he is under judicial custody. while so, he tendered the entire amount due, which was ordered by way of fine. the substantive sentence comes to till the rising of the court and that is already over by the detention already undergone. as such, there is no necessity to proceed further with the revision. the amount paid by way of penalty/fine can be raised before the trial court. without prejudice to the said right, the criminal revision petition will stand dismissed as not pressed. sd/- p.somarajan judge dmr/-

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN FRIDAY, THE 12th DAY OF APRIL 2024 / 23RD CHAITHRA, 1946 CRL.REV.PET NO. 368 OF 2023 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 28.06.2019 IN CRL.APPEAL No.23/2019 OF ADDITIONAL SESSIONS COURT, MANANTHAVADY ARISING OUT OF THE

JUDGMENT DATED 28.02.2019 IN ST NO.349 OF 2014 OF JUDICIAL

MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS-I, MANANTHAVADY PETITIONER/APPELLANT/ACCUSED: SHEENA, AGED 32 YEARS, D/o AMMU, KALLITTAMKUZHI VEEDU, ANCHUKUNNU. P.O., MANANTHAVADY TALUK, WAYANAD, PIN - 670645 BY ADVS. SHAKTHI PRAKASH K.DHRUV KUMAR HARIKRISHNAN M.S. RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANT: 1 MUHAMMAD SUNEER, AGED 39 YEARS, S/o ASSAINAR, POOVATHANKANDI HOUSE, PANAMARAM P.O & VILLAGE, MANANTHAVADY TALUK, WAYANAD, PIN - 670721 2 STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682031 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI SANGEETHARAJ N R THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12.04.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Crl.R.P.No.368 of 2023 2

ORDER

When the matter came up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submitted that the accused was already arrested on 10.04.2024 and he is under judicial custody. While so, he tendered the entire amount due, which was ordered by way of fine. The substantive sentence comes to till the rising of the court and that is already over by the detention already undergone. As such, there is no necessity to proceed further with the revision. The amount paid by way of penalty/fine can be raised before the trial court. Without prejudice to the said right, the criminal revision petition will stand dismissed as not pressed. Sd/- P.SOMARAJAN JUDGE DMR/-

Same Court & Year Kerala Orders · 2024 Same Parties Sheena vs Muhammad Suneer Same Subject Right to Information Same Judge Honourable Mr. Justice P.Somarajan