Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Dineesh , vs State of Kerala,

Dineesh , vs State of Kerala,

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Feb 29, 2024
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1286894

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Bail Appl./483/2024
Subject
Right to Information

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Right to Information

Key legal issue
Right to Information

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Dineesh ,

Respondent

State of Kerala,

Excerpt

.....of kerala, pin - 682031 by sr pp smt seetha s this bail application having come up for admission on 29.02.2024, the court on the same day delivered the following: -:2:- dated this the 29th day of february,2024orderthe application is filed under section 438 of the code of criminal procedure,1973, for an order of pre- arrest bail.2. the petitioner is the sixth accused in crimeno.1449/2023 of the alappuzha south police station, registered against the accused (eight in number), for allegedly committing the offences punishable under sections 143, 147, 148, 324 and 307 read with sec.149 of the indian penal code.3. when the bail application came up forconsideration on 07.02.2024, this court passed an interim order, by directing the petitioner to surrender before the investigating officer within seven days from the date of order and subject himself for interrogation.4. heard; sri.govind chandrabhanu, the learned -:3:- counsel appearing for the petitioner and smt.seetha.s, the learned public prosecutor appearing for the respondent.5. today, when the bail application was taken upfor hearing, the learned public prosecutor submitted that the petitioner had appeared before the investigating officer and his interrogation was completed on 12.2.2024. the petitioner’s further presence is not required. hence, the interim order can be made absolute, subject to additional conditions. the said submission is recorded. resultantly, the bail application is disposed of by making the interim order dated 07.02.2024 absolute, subject to the following conditions:(i) the petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation and make himself available for interrogation and for the purpose of investigation as and when the investigating officer directs; -:4:-(ii) the petitioner shall not intimidate witnesses or interfere with the investigation in any manner;(iii) the petitioner shall not get involved in any other offence while on bail.(iv) the petitioner shall not leave india without the.....

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS THURSDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2024 / 10TH PHALGUNA, BAIL APPL. NO. 483 OF 2024 CRIME NO.1449/2023 OF ALAPPUZHA SOUTH POLICE STATION, ALAPPUZHA PETITIONER/ACCUSED 6: DINEESH , AGED 38 YEARS S/O DINESHAN,VALLIKKADU, SHASTRIPURAM AVALOOKUNNU PO,SOUTH ARYADM,ALAPPUZHA, PIN - 688006

BY ADV GOVIND CHANDRABHANU RESPONDENT: STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, PIN - 682031 BY SR PP SMT SEETHA S THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29.02.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: -:2:- Dated this the 29th day of February,2024

ORDER

The application is filed under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure,1973, for an order of pre- arrest bail.

2. The petitioner is the sixth accused in Crime

No.1449/2023 of the Alappuzha South Police Station, registered against the accused (eight in number), for allegedly committing the offences punishable under Sections 143, 147, 148, 324 and 307 read with Sec.149 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. When the bail application came up for

consideration on 07.02.2024, this Court passed an interim order, by directing the petitioner to surrender before the Investigating Officer within seven days from the date of order and subject himself for interrogation.

4. Heard; Sri.Govind Chandrabhanu, the learned -:3:- counsel appearing for the petitioner and Smt.Seetha.S, the learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent.

5. Today, when the bail application was taken up

for hearing, the learned Public Prosecutor submitted that the petitioner had appeared before the Investigating Officer and his interrogation was completed on 12.2.2024. The petitioner’s further presence is not required. Hence, the interim order can be made absolute, subject to additional conditions. The said submission is recorded. Resultantly, the bail application is disposed of by making the interim order dated 07.02.2024 absolute, subject to the following conditions:

(i) The petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation and make himself available for interrogation and for the purpose of investigation as and when the Investigating Officer directs; -:4:-

(ii) The petitioner shall not intimidate witnesses or interfere with the investigation in any manner;

(iii) The petitioner shall not get involved in any other offence while on bail.

(iv) The petitioner shall not leave India without the permission of the jurisdictional Court;

(v) In case of violation of any of the conditions

above, the jurisdictional Court shall be empowered to consider the application for cancellation of bail, if any filed, and pass orders on the same, in accordance with law.

(vi) Applications for deletion/modification of the bail conditions shall also be filed before the court below.

(vii) Needless to mention, it would be well within

the powers of the Investigating Officer to investigate the matter and, if necessary, to effect recoveries on the information, if any, given by the petitioners even while the petitioner is on -:5:- bail as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Sushila Aggarwal v. State (NCT of Delhi) and another [2020 (1) KHC 663]. Sd/- C.S.DIAS,JUDGE mtk/29.02.24 -:6:- APPENDIX OF BAIL APPL. 483/2024 PETITIONER ANNEXURES ANNEXURE 1 TRUE COPY OF BAIL ORDER IN CRLMP NO

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial