Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Monish Kumar. V vs State of Kerala

Monish Kumar. V vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Feb 28, 2024
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1286205

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Bail Appl./522/2023
Subject
Right to Information

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Right to Information

Key legal issue
Right to Information

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Monish Kumar. V

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr.justice c.s.dias wednesday, the 28th day of february 2024 / 9th phalguna, 1945 bail appl. no. 522 of 2023 crime no.1825/2022 of chadayamanagalam police station, kollam petitioner: monish kumar. v aged 53 years c/o vikraman pillai, m.s land, moolabhagam, moothala p.o, pallickal, thiruvananthapuram, pin - 695604 by adv m.r.sasithrespondent: state of kerala represented by public prosecutor,high court of kerala, pin - 682031 other present: sr pp smt seetha s this bail application having come up for admission on 28.02.2024, the court on the same day delivered the following: -:2:- dated this the 28th day of february,2024orderthe application is filed under section 438 of the code of criminal procedure, 1973, for an order of pre-arrest bail.2. the petitioner is the accused in crimeno.1825/2022 of chadayamangalam police station, kollam, registered against the accused for allegedly committing the offence punishable under section 379 read with section 34 of the indian penal code, 1860. hence, the bail application.3. heard; sri. m.r. sasith, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and smt. seetha s., the learned senior public prosecutor appearing for the respondent.4. the learned public prosecutor, on instructions, submits that, the petitioner was arrested on 23.02.2023, the investigation in the case is complete -:3:- and the final report has been laid before the jurisdictional court on 24.04.2023. therefore, the bail application has become infructuous. recording the said submission, the bail application is dismissed as infructuous. sd/- c.s.dias,judge dst/28.02.24 //true copy// p.a. to judge

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS WEDNESDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2024 / 9TH PHALGUNA, 1945 BAIL APPL. NO. 522 OF 2023 CRIME NO.1825/2022 OF CHADAYAMANAGALAM POLICE STATION, KOLLAM PETITIONER: MONISH KUMAR. V AGED 53 YEARS C/O VIKRAMAN PILLAI, M.S LAND, MOOLABHAGAM, MOOTHALA P.O, PALLICKAL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695604 BY ADV M.R.SASITH

RESPONDENT: STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF KERALA, PIN - 682031 OTHER PRESENT: SR PP SMT SEETHA S THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28.02.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: -:2:- Dated this the 28th day of February,2024

ORDER

The application is filed under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, for an order of pre-arrest bail.

2. The petitioner is the accused in Crime

No.1825/2022 of Chadayamangalam Police Station, Kollam, registered against the accused for allegedly committing the offence punishable under Section 379 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. Hence, the bail application.

3. Heard; Sri. M.R. Sasith, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Smt. Seetha S., the learned Senior Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent.

4. The learned Public Prosecutor, on instructions, submits that, the petitioner was arrested on 23.02.2023, the investigation in the case is complete -:3:- and the final report has been laid before the jurisdictional court on 24.04.2023. Therefore, the bail application has become infructuous. Recording the said submission, the bail application is dismissed as infructuous. Sd/- C.S.DIAS,JUDGE DST/28.02.24 //True copy// P.A. To Judge

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial