Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

Raju Thomas vs Devu

Raju Thomas vs DEVU

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Jan 31, 2024
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1286179

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
RSA/47/2024
Subject
Right to Information

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Right to Information

Key legal issue
Right to Information

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Raju Thomas

Respondent

DEVU

Excerpt

.....years w/o maradi kunhiraman nair, sreenivasa estate, pathumala post, pachakkad, vellarimala amsom,desom, vythiri, taluk, wayanad district, 2 sreenivasan aged 52 years, s/o.maradikunhiraman nair, sreenivasa estate, puthumala post, pachakkad, vellarimala amsom & desom vythiri taluk, wayanad district,, 3 unnikrishnan aged 54 years s/o.maradikunhiraman nair sreenivasa, vellarimala amsom & desom, 4 vasumathi aged 44 years d/o.maradikunhiraman nair, sreenivasa, vellarimala amsom & desom, vythiri taluk, wayanad district, this regular second appeal having come up for admission on 31.01.2024, the court on the same day delivered the following:judgmentdated this the 31st day of january, 2024 this regular second appeal has been filed under section 100 read with order xlii rule 1 of the code of civil procedure, 1908, challenging the decree and judgment dated 27.08.2022 in a.s.no.06/2018 on the files of the district judge, kalpetta, arose out of the decree and judgment dated 26.09.2018 in o.s.no.27/2012 on the files of the sub judge, sulthanbathery. the appellants herein are the plaintiffs.2. after arguing for a while, the learned counsel forthe appellants sought permission to withdraw this regular second appeal. permission is granted. accordingly, this regular second appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn. registry shall inform this matter to the trial court as well as the appellate court for information and future guidance. sd/- a. badharudeen judge nkr

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. BADHARUDEEN WEDNESDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF JANUARY 2024/11TH MAGHA, 1945 AGAINST THE DECREE AND JUDGMENT DATED 27.08.2022 IN AS 6/2018 OF DISTRICT COURT, KALPETTA ARISING FROM THE DECREE AND JUDGMENT DATED 26.09.2018 IN OS 27/2012 OF SUB COURT, SULTHANBATHERY

APPELLANTS/APPELLANTS/PLAINTIFFS: 1 RAJU THOMAS AGED 67 YEARS S/O K.C THOMAS, KALAVARA HOUSE, PUTHUMALA POST, VELLARIMALA VILLAGE, PIN - 691 554 2 TONY THOMAS AGED 66 YEARS S/O. K. C.THOMAS, KALAVARA HOUSE, PUTHUMALA POST,VELLARIMALA VILLAGE, VYTHIRI TALUK,WAYANAD DISTRICT, 3 MOLLY MARIYA GONZLVEZ AGED 65 YEARS D/O.K.C THOMAS, AVILA COTTAGE, CHUNDEL POST, AMSOM AND DESOM, VYTHIRI TALUK, WAYANAD DISTRICT, PIN - 691554 4 LAILA MATHEW AGED 63 YEARS D/O K.C.THOMAS, AVILA COTTAGE, CHUNDEL POST, CHUNDEL AMSOM DESOM, VYIHIRI TALUK, WAYANAD DISTRICT, BY ADVS. AJITH VISWANATHAN SHIBU JOSEPH SAYED MANSOOR BAFAKHY THANGAL HAIRA SOLOMON RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS: 1 DEVU AGED 80 YEARS W/O MARADI KUNHIRAMAN NAIR, SREENIVASA ESTATE, PATHUMALA POST, PACHAKKAD, VELLARIMALA AMSOM,DESOM, VYTHIRI, TALUK, WAYANAD DISTRICT, 2 SREENIVASAN AGED 52 YEARS, S/O.MARADIKUNHIRAMAN NAIR, SREENIVASA ESTATE, PUTHUMALA POST, PACHAKKAD, VELLARIMALA AMSOM & DESOM VYTHIRI TALUK, WAYANAD DISTRICT,, 3 UNNIKRISHNAN AGED 54 YEARS S/O.MARADIKUNHIRAMAN NAIR SREENIVASA, VELLARIMALA AMSOM & DESOM, 4 VASUMATHI AGED 44 YEARS D/O.MARADIKUNHIRAMAN NAIR, SREENIVASA, VELLARIMALA AMSOM & DESOM, VYTHIRI TALUK, WAYANAD DISTRICT, THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 31.01.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT

Dated this the 31st day of January, 2024 This regular second appeal has been filed under Section 100 read with Order XLII Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the decree and judgment dated 27.08.2022 in A.S.No.06/2018 on the files of the District Judge, Kalpetta, arose out of the decree and judgment dated 26.09.2018 in O.S.No.27/2012 on the files of the sub Judge, Sulthanbathery. The appellants herein are the plaintiffs.

2. After arguing for a while, the learned counsel for

the appellants sought permission to withdraw this regular second appeal. Permission is granted. Accordingly, this regular second appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn. Registry shall inform this matter to the trial court as well as the appellate court for information and future guidance. Sd/- A. BADHARUDEEN JUDGE nkr

Continue Your Research

Same Court & Year Kerala Orders · 2024 Same Parties Raju Thomas vs DEVU Same Subject Right to Information Same Judge Honourable Mr. Justice a. Badharudeen
Right to Information

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales