Full Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. BADHARUDEEN MONDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF JANUARY 2024 / 2ND MAGHA, 1945 RP NO. 38 OF 2024 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 05.01.2024 IN EX.S.A.NO.3 OF 2023 REVIEW PETITIONER/APPELLANT IN EX.S.A/APPELLANT/CLAIM PETITIONER IN E.A/3RD PARTY IN EP: A.V. VIMALKUMAR AGED 48 YEARS S/O U.V. RAMANATHAN, RESIDING AT 'AARATHI', MANKURISSI P.O., MANKARA VILLAGE, PALAKKAD TALUK AND DISTRICT, PIN - 678613 BY ADV P.B.KRISHNAN RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS IN EX.S.A/RESPONDENTS 1 TO 5 & 7 TO 28 IN A.S/RESPONDENT NOS.1 TO 5 & 7 TO 24 IN E.A./DH & JDS IN E.P:
1 RAHMATH W/O (LATE) ABDUL RAHIMAN, CHANDANAPURAM, KALAVANGODE, 2 SHAMLA 3 SHAMEERA 4 SHERINA 5 SHAMNAS 6 MARIYA D/O (LATE) SYED MUHAMMED RAWTHER & W/O YUSUF, ZEENATH MANZIL, KALLADIPATTA, ONGALLUR THERUVU,
PATTAMBI, PALAKKAD DISTRICT, PIN - 679313 7 FATHIMA D/O LATE SYED MUHAMMED RAWTHER & W/O USSANAR, FATHIMA MANZIL, KOTTEKKAD, PALAKKAD, PIN - 678732 8 SULAIKA D/O (LATE) SYED MUHAMMED RAWTHER & W/O ALI AHAMMED, VALLIKKAD HOUSE, KAMBA, VALLIKODE, PALAKKAD, PIN - 678594 9 SARA D/O (LATE) SYED MUHAMMED RAWTHER, & W/O UMMER, PARAKKAL HOUSE, PARASSERY, KONGAD, PALAKKAD DISTRICT, PIN - 678631 10 VELAN S/O (LATE) CHAMI, CHANDANAPURAM, NAGARIPURAM P.O., 11 PARU D/O (LATE) CHAMI, CHANDANAPURAM, NAGARIPURAM P.O., 12 SUBHADRA W/O (LATE) KANDAN, CHANDANAPURAM, NAGARIPURAM P.O., 13 ARULDAS S/O (LATE) KANDAN, CHANDANAPURAM, NAGARIPURAM P.O., 14 ARUL JYOTHI 15 AMBILI 16 MEENAKSHI W/O (LATE) RAMAN, CHANDANAPURAM, NAGARIPURAM P.O., 17 MANOJ C.C 18 KRISHNANKUTTY. C.C 19 BINDHU. C.C., D/O (LATE) RAMAN, CHANDANAPURAM, NAGARIPURAM P.O., 20 SURESH. C.C
21 SURENDRAN. C.C. 22 KUTTAPPAN S/O (LATE) VELLACHI, PANDANTHARA HOUSE, 23 MARIA W/O ASSANAR, CHETTANPULLAKKAL HOUSE, MANNUR P.O., 24 ABUTHAHIR 25 ABDUL SALAM 26 ASHARAF ALI THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22.01.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Dated this the 22nd day of January, 2024
This review petition has been filed under Order
XLVII Rule 1 read with Section 114 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 to review judgment of this Court in Ex.S.A. No.3/2023 dated 05.01.2024.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the review petitioner and the learned senior counsel appearing for the respondents.
3. On hearing, it appears that there is no apparent error on the face of the order, so as to exercise the limited power of review, since this Court passed a detailed
judgment on merits in Ex.S.A. No.3/2023 as per judgment
dated 05.01.2024. Therefore, this review petition is devoid of any merits and is accordingly dismissed. Sd/- A. BADHARUDEEN SK JUDGE