Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Ahammed Kabeer, vs State of Kerala,

Ahammed Kabeer, vs State of Kerala,

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Jan 29, 2024
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1285607

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Bail Appl./299/2024
Subject
Right to Information

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Right to Information

Key legal issue
Right to Information

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ahammed Kabeer,

Respondent

State of Kerala,

Excerpt

.....custody from 27.11.2023 onwards and investigation has substantially progressed, and so his continued detention is not necessary. moreover, the petitioner is made an accused due to some financial dispute between the mother of the victim girl and the petitioner herein.6. on going through the statement of the victim girl,produced by learned public prosecutor, it could be seen that the petitioner is a distant relative of the victim girl and she was sent along with the petitioner for a package tour to ajmeer by the mother of the victim, fully believing him. but he exploited the situation and sexually assaulted her. subsequently after coming back from ajmeer, on some other day, he took her in his car and sexually assaulted her. considering the gravity of the offence and the factum of relationship between the petitioner and the victim girl, it could be seen that the petitioner, exploiting the innocence and hapless situation of the victim girl, sexually assaulted her, on various occasions. so this court is not inclined torelease him on bail at present, as the investigation has not completed. if he is released on bail, there is every chance for influencing or intimidating the witnesses. in the result, this bail application stands dismissed. sd/- sophy thomas judge ssk/29/01 appendix of bail appl. 299/2024 petitioner annexures annexure a1 certified copy of the order in crl.m.p 6159/2023 dated 22.12.2023 before the additional sessions court-i , palakkad

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SOPHY THOMAS MONDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF JANUARY 2024 / 9TH MAGHA, 1945 BAIL APPL. NO. 299 OF 2024 CRIME NO.836/2023 OF Cherpulassery Police Station, Palakkad PETITIONER/ACCUSED: AHAMMED KABEER, AGED 36 YEARS S/O.HAMZA, KALAKUNNATH (H), PANNIYAMKURUSSY, CHERUPULASSERY, OTTAPALLAM TALUK , MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 679503 BY ADVS. BINDUMOL JOSEPH V.HARIKRISHNAN BEENA JOSEPH M.V.RAHUL RIYAS M.B. RESPONDENT/STATE: STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, PIN - 682031 SR.PP-SRI.RENJIT GEORGE THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29.01.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

ORDER

Dated this the 29th day of January, 2024 This is an application for regular bail under Section 439 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 filed by the sole accused in Crime No.836 of 2023 of Cherpulassery Police Station, Palakkad, registered under Sections 376, 376(2)(n) of IPC and Section 6 r/w Section 5(1) & (p) and Section 8 r/w Section 7 of POCSO Act.

2. Prosecution allegation is that during the period

24.08.2023 to 24.11.2023, the petitioner who is a married man, making false promise of marriage, sexually assaulted the victim girl aged 16 years, while they were on a package tour to Ajmeer, and even after coming back.

3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor.

4. Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail application.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that

the petitioner is in judicial custody from 27.11.2023 onwards and investigation has substantially progressed, and so his continued detention is not necessary. Moreover, the petitioner is made an accused due to some financial dispute between the mother of the victim girl and the petitioner herein.

6. On going through the statement of the victim girl,

produced by learned Public Prosecutor, it could be seen that the petitioner is a distant relative of the victim girl and she was sent along with the petitioner for a package tour to Ajmeer by the mother of the victim, fully believing him. But he exploited the situation and sexually assaulted her. Subsequently after coming back from Ajmeer, on some other day, he took her in his car and sexually assaulted her. Considering the gravity of the offence and the factum of relationship between the petitioner and the victim girl, it could be seen that the petitioner, exploiting the innocence and hapless situation of the victim girl, sexually assaulted her, on various occasions. So this Court is not inclined to

release him on bail at present, as the investigation has not completed. If he is released on bail, there is every chance for influencing or intimidating the witnesses. In the result, this bail application stands dismissed. Sd/- SOPHY THOMAS JUDGE SSK/29/01 APPENDIX OF BAIL APPL. 299/2024 PETITIONER ANNEXURES Annexure A1 CERTIFIED COPY OF THE ORDER IN CRL.M.P 6159/2023 DATED 22.12.2023 BEFORE THE ADDITIONAL SESSIONS COURT-I , PALAKKAD

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial