Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Ruby, W/O. Ithappiri vs N S K Umesh Ias, the District Collector

Ruby, W/O. Ithappiri vs N S K Umesh Ias, the District Collector

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Feb 19, 2024
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1284937

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Con.Case(C)/81/2024
Subject
Right to Information

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Right to Information

Key legal issue
Right to Information

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ruby, W/O. Ithappiri

Respondent

N S K Umesh Ias, the District Collector

Excerpt

.....this contempt of court case (civil) having come up for admission on 19.02.2024, the court on the same day delivered the following: con.case(c) no. 81 of 2024 2judgmentlearned government pleader has filed a memo producing therewith a copy of the proceedings passed in compliance with the no.24088 of 2023.2. learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner would submit that the proceedings is not in compliance with the directions contained in the judgment dated 24.07.2023.3. learned government pleader submits that, if the petitioner is anyway aggrieved by the proceedings now issued, it is for her to challenge the same, in accordance with the law.4. having heard the learned counsel appearing for the writpetitioner and the learned government pleader and having regard to the fact that the proceedings have been issued pursuant to the no.24088 of 2023, the contempt of court case is closed, making itcleat that, it will be open to the petitioner to challenge the ordernow issued, if she is aggrieved by the same, taking up all con.case(c) no. 81 of 2024 3 contentions, including any contention taken up earlier, before this court. sd/- gopinath p. judge ajt con.case(c) no. 81 of 2024 4 appendix of con.case(c) 81/2024 petitioner annexures annexure 1 certified copy of the judgment dated 24.07.2023 in w.p(c) no. 24088/2023of this hon'ble court annexure ii true copy of the receipt along with the application dated 11.08.2023issued by the district collector

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P. MONDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2024 / 30TH MAGHA, 1945 CON.CASE(C) NO. 81 OF 2024 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT WP(C) 24088/2023 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA PETITIONER/PETITIONER IN WPC: RUBY, W/O. ITHAPPIRI AGED 53 YEARS KOORAN PLANKUDY HOUSE KALLUPALAM, ANGAMALY P.O, ANAGAMALY VILLAGE, ALUVA TALUK, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 683572 BY ADVS. V.K.PEERMOHAMED KHAN GIRISH KUMAR V.C ASNA M.B. RESPONDENT/1ST PETITIONER IN WPC:

N S K UMESH IAS, THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR AGE AND FATHERS NAME IS NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, COLLECTORATE, KAKKANAD, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682030 BY ADV ADVOCATE GENERAL OFFICE KERALA SRI. VENUGOPAL V., GP THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19.02.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: CON.CASE(C) NO. 81 OF 2024 2

JUDGMENT

Learned Government Pleader has filed a memo producing therewith a copy of the proceedings passed in compliance with the No.24088 of 2023.

2. Learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner would submit that the proceedings is not in compliance with the directions contained in the judgment dated 24.07.2023.

3. Learned Government Pleader submits that, if the petitioner is anyway aggrieved by the proceedings now issued, it is for her to challenge the same, in accordance with the law.

4. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the writ

petitioner and the learned Government Pleader and having regard to the fact that the proceedings have been issued pursuant to the No.24088 of 2023, the Contempt of Court Case is closed, making it

cleat that, it will be open to the petitioner to challenge the order

now issued, if she is aggrieved by the same, taking up all CON.CASE(C) NO. 81 OF 2024 3 contentions, including any contention taken up earlier, before this Court. Sd/- GOPINATH P. JUDGE ajt CON.CASE(C) NO. 81 OF 2024 4 APPENDIX OF CON.CASE(C) 81/2024 PETITIONER ANNEXURES Annexure 1 CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 24.07.2023 IN W.P(C) NO. 24088/2023OF THIS HON'BLE COURT Annexure II TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT ALONG WITH THE APPLICATION DATED 11.08.2023ISSUED BY THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial