Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Robin Thomas Vs The State of Kerala represented by The Public Prosecutor

Robin Thomas vs The State of Kerala represented by The Public Prosecutor

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided May 03, 2024
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1284504

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Crl.MC/129/2023
Subject
Right to Information

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Right to Information

Key legal issue
Right to Information

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Robin Thomas

Respondent

The State of Kerala represented by The Public Prosecutor

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice g.girish friday, the 3rd day of may 2024 / 13th vaisakha, 1946 crl.mc no. 129 of 2023 crime no.179/2020 of mulanthuruthy police station, ernakulam petitioner/accused 1: robin thomas aged 41 years nirappel house, koothattukulam village, edayar, pin - 686662 by advs. santhosh peter (mamalayil) m.s.sandeep sudhakaran rohit lobo p.n.anoop respondents/state/defacto complainant: 1 the state of kerala represented by the public prosecutor, high court of kerala, ernakulam, pin - 682031 2 raju cherian aged 52 years ambattil house, arakkunnam, mulamthuruthi, ernakulam district, pin - 682313 by smt maya m.n this criminal misc. case having come up for admission on 03.05.2024, the court on the same day passed the following:g. girish, j.-------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------- dated this the 3rd day of may, 2024orderthe learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a withdrawal memo stating that the dispute between the parties has been settled and, hence, there is no need to proceed with this crl.mc.2. in the light of the above memo filed by the learnedcounsel for the petitioner, the proceedings are closed. sd/- g. girish, judge mtk/03.05.24 appendix of crl.mc 129/2023 petitioner annexures annexure 1 certified copy of the final report in crime no.179/2020 of mulamthuruthy police station annexure2 true copy of the declaration made by the 2nd respondent/ defacto complainant to the petitioner dated 25.11.2019

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.GIRISH FRIDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF MAY 2024 / 13TH VAISAKHA, 1946 CRL.MC NO. 129 OF 2023 CRIME NO.179/2020 OF Mulanthuruthy Police Station, Ernakulam PETITIONER/ACCUSED 1: ROBIN THOMAS AGED 41 YEARS NIRAPPEL HOUSE, KOOTHATTUKULAM VILLAGE, EDAYAR, PIN - 686662 BY ADVS. SANTHOSH PETER (MAMALAYIL) M.S.SANDEEP SUDHAKARAN ROHIT LOBO P.N.ANOOP RESPONDENTS/STATE/DEFACTO COMPLAINANT: 1 THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682031 2 RAJU CHERIAN AGED 52 YEARS AMBATTIL HOUSE, ARAKKUNNAM, MULAMTHURUTHI, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN - 682313 BY SMT MAYA M.N THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03.05.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

G. GIRISH, J.

-------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 3rd day of May, 2024

ORDER

The learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a withdrawal memo stating that the dispute between the parties has been settled and, hence, there is no need to proceed with this Crl.MC.

2. In the light of the above memo filed by the learned

counsel for the petitioner, the proceedings are closed. Sd/- G. GIRISH, JUDGE mtk/03.05.24 APPENDIX OF CRL.MC 129/2023 PETITIONER ANNEXURES Annexure 1 CERTIFIED COPY OF THE FINAL REPORT IN CRIME NO.179/2020 OF MULAMTHURUTHY POLICE STATION Annexure2 TRUE COPY OF THE DECLARATION MADE BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT/ DEFACTO COMPLAINANT TO THE PETITIONER DATED 25.11.2019

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial