Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Chinna vs Nani

Chinna vs NANI

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Mar 05, 2024
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1284145

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
AS/316/1999
Subject
Service

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Service

Key legal issue
Service

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Chinna

Respondent

NANI

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice sathish ninan tuesday, the 5th day of march 2024 / 15th phalguna, 1945 as no. 316 of 1999 against the judgment and decree dated 21.3.1998 in os no.372 of 1993 of the sub court, palakkad appellant/plaintiff: chinna, wife of kanda moothan, residing at pullampadam, vandazhy amsom, alathur taluk, palakkad district. sri.t.c.suresh menon respondents / lr's of 1st defendant / 2nd defendant:1. nani, widow of appukuttan2. kannan, s/o. appukuttan3. murali, s/o.appukuttan respondents 1 to 3 are residing at alingal house, mathur, mudappallur p.o., palakkad4. sobhana, w/o.kesavan, residing at house no.89/6, near guest house, indu nagar, h.p.f., ootty-5 vilasini, w/o.narayanan, residing at kiliyali,5. cheramangalam p.o., palakkad.6. radha, w/o.ananthan, residing at chettumcode, vandazhy p.o., palakkad omana, w/o.mohanan master, residing at -: 2 :-7. thekkumuri, elavancherry, palakkad.8. kancha, w/o.mani, residing at pottimada, kattusseri amsom, alathur taluk, palakkad [first defendant died after the pronounciation of judgment in the court below] sri.t.a.unnikrishnan sri.p.vijaya bhanu this appeal suits having come up for hearing on 05.03.2024, the court on the same day delivered the following: -: 3 :-sathish ninan, j.============================== ========================== dated this the 5th day of march, 2024judgmentthe learned counsel for the appellant reports no instructions from the party. the appeal suits is dismissed for non- prosecution. sd/- sathish ninan, judge rsr

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATHISH NINAN TUESDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF MARCH 2024 / 15TH PHALGUNA, 1945 AS NO. 316 OF 1999 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 21.3.1998 IN OS NO.372 OF 1993 OF THE SUB COURT, PALAKKAD APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF: CHINNA, WIFE OF KANDA MOOTHAN, RESIDING AT PULLAMPADAM, VANDAZHY AMSOM, ALATHUR TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. SRI.T.C.SURESH MENON RESPONDENTS / LR'S OF 1ST DEFENDANT / 2ND DEFENDANT:

1. NANI, WIDOW OF APPUKUTTAN

2. KANNAN, S/O. APPUKUTTAN

3. MURALI, S/O.APPUKUTTAN RESPONDENTS 1 TO 3 ARE RESIDING AT ALINGAL HOUSE, MATHUR, MUDAPPALLUR P.O., PALAKKAD

4. SOBHANA, W/O.KESAVAN, RESIDING AT HOUSE NO.89/6, NEAR GUEST HOUSE, INDU NAGAR, H.P.F., OOTTY-5 VILASINI, W/O.NARAYANAN, RESIDING AT KILIYALI,

5. CHERAMANGALAM P.O., PALAKKAD.

6. RADHA, W/O.ANANTHAN, RESIDING AT CHETTUMCODE, VANDAZHY P.O., PALAKKAD OMANA, W/O.MOHANAN MASTER, RESIDING AT -: 2 :-

7. THEKKUMURI, ELAVANCHERRY, PALAKKAD.

8. KANCHA, W/O.MANI, RESIDING AT POTTIMADA, KATTUSSERI AMSOM, ALATHUR TALUK, PALAKKAD [FIRST DEFENDANT DIED AFTER THE PRONOUNCIATION OF JUDGMENT IN THE COURT BELOW] SRI.T.A.UNNIKRISHNAN SRI.P.VIJAYA BHANU THIS APPEAL SUITS HAVING COME UP FOR HEARING ON 05.03.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: -: 3 :-

Sathish Ninan, J.

============================== ========================== Dated this the 5th day of March, 2024

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the appellant reports no instructions from the party. The Appeal Suits is dismissed for non- prosecution. Sd/- Sathish Ninan, Judge rsr

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial