Paul, vs State of Kerala,

PAUL, vs State of Kerala,

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Mar 27, 2025

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1283412

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1283412
Court: Kerala High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr.Justice V.G.Arun
Decided On: Mar 27, 2025
Case Number: Crl.MC/8389/2024
Subject: Right to Information

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Right to Information

Key legal issue: Right to Information

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

PAUL,

Respondent

State of Kerala,

Excerpt

.....represented by public prosecutor, high court of kerala, pin - 682031 2 ratnam, aged 61 years, w/o.vijayan, kadukutty madathil house, 3 visalakshiamma, aged 70 years, d/o. raman kadukutty madathil house, koprakalam desom, k.p.sujesh kumar bijukumar k. sri. m.c. ashi, pp. this criminal misc. case having come up for admission on 27.03.2025, the court on the same day passed the following:orderalthough learned counsel on both sides advanced arguments on merits, considering that the calendar case is of the year 2015, rather than deciding whether to invoke the power under section 482 of cr.p.c, it should be left for the trial court to dispose of the matter at the earliest. learned counsel on both sides assure that they will cooperate with the court. the crl.m.c is hence disposed of by directing the judicial first class magistrate court, irinjalakuda, to take earnest efforts to conduct trial and dispose of c.c.no.3057 of 2015 within one month of receipt of a copy of this order. as it is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that their identity is not disputed, they can be exempted from personal appearance during trial, if an application for that purpose is submitted.sd/- v.g.arun judge spv appendix of crl.mc 8389/2024 petitioners’ annexures annexure -a true copy of the first information statement in crime no. 426/15 of kodakara police station, thrissur annexure -b true copy of the final report in crime no. thrissur annexure -c a copy of plaint in os. 2137/15 on the file of munsiff court, irinajalakkuda annexure -d a copy of judgment in o.s. no. 2137/15 on the file of munsiff court, irinajalakkuda respondents’ annexures: nil //true copy// pa to judge

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.G.ARUN THURSDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF MARCH 2025 / 6TH CHAITHRA, 1947 CRIME NO.426/2015 OF KODAKARA POLICE STATION, THRISSUR PETITIONERS: 1 PAUL, AGED 70 YEARS S/O. DEVASSY, CHATHELI HOUSE, 2 BASTIAN, AGED 38 YEARS CHATHELI HOUSE,KOPRAKALAM DESOM, SANTHOSH P.PODUVAL R.RAJITHA CHITHRA S.BABU RESPONDENTS: 1 STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, PIN - 682031 2 RATNAM, AGED 61 YEARS, W/O.VIJAYAN, KADUKUTTY MADATHIL HOUSE, 3 VISALAKSHIAMMA, AGED 70 YEARS, D/O. RAMAN KADUKUTTY MADATHIL HOUSE, KOPRAKALAM DESOM, K.P.SUJESH KUMAR BIJUKUMAR K. SRI. M.C. ASHI, PP. THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27.03.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

ORDER

Although learned counsel on both sides advanced arguments on merits, considering that the Calendar Case is of the year 2015, rather than deciding whether to invoke the power under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, it should be left for the trial court to dispose of the matter at the earliest. Learned counsel on both sides assure that they will cooperate with the court. The Crl.M.C is hence disposed of by directing the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Irinjalakuda, to take earnest efforts to conduct trial and dispose of C.C.No.3057 of 2015 within one month of receipt of a copy of this order. As it is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that their identity is not disputed, they can be exempted from personal appearance during trial, if an application for that purpose is submitted.

Sd/- V.G.ARUN JUDGE SPV APPENDIX OF CRL.MC 8389/2024 PETITIONERS’ ANNEXURES ANNEXURE -A TRUE COPY OF THE FIRST INFORMATION STATEMENT IN CRIME NO. 426/15 OF KODAKARA POLICE STATION, THRISSUR ANNEXURE -B TRUE COPY OF THE FINAL REPORT IN CRIME NO. THRISSUR ANNEXURE -C A COPY OF PLAINT IN OS. 2137/15 ON THE FILE OF MUNSIFF COURT, IRINAJALAKKUDA ANNEXURE -D A COPY OF JUDGMENT IN O.S. NO. 2137/15 ON THE FILE OF MUNSIFF COURT, IRINAJALAKKUDA RESPONDENTS’ ANNEXURES: NIL //TRUE COPY// PA TO JUDGE

Same Court & Year Kerala · 2025 Same Parties PAUL, vs State of Kerala, Same Subject Right to Information Same Judge Honourable Mr.Justice V.G.Arun