Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Favaz vs Nazrin

FAVAZ vs Nazrin

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Apr 02, 2025
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1281904

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
RPFC/99/2016
Subject
Right to Information

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Right to Information

Key legal issue
Right to Information

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

FAVAZ

Respondent

Nazrin

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable dr. justice kauser edappagath wednesday, the 2nd day of april 2025 / 12th chaithra, 1947 rpfc no. 99 of 2016 against the order dated 18.01.2016 in mc no.160 of 2013 of family court,thrissur revision petitioner/respondent: favaz s/o.abdul rasak, korattiparambil house, engandiyoor village, kundaliyur, chavakkad. by advs. sri.s.u.nazar sri.mansoor.b.h. respondents/petitioners: 1 nazrin d/o.ismail, melepurayidathil house, p.o.kallur, amballur, thrissur - 680 024. 2 minor ayan 10 months (represented by the first respondent/ mother). by adv. sri.m.premchand this rev.petition(family court) having come up for admission on 02.04.2025, the court on the same day delivered the following: rpfc no.99 of 2016orderthe learned counsel for the revision petitioner submitted that the revision petition is not pressed. the said submission is recorded. accordingly, this revision petition is dismissed as not pressed. sd/- dr. kauser edappagath judge br

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE KAUSER EDAPPAGATH WEDNESDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF APRIL 2025 / 12TH CHAITHRA, 1947 RPFC NO. 99 OF 2016 AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 18.01.2016 IN MC NO.160 OF 2013 OF FAMILY COURT,THRISSUR REVISION PETITIONER/RESPONDENT: FAVAZ S/O.ABDUL RASAK, KORATTIPARAMBIL HOUSE, ENGANDIYOOR VILLAGE, KUNDALIYUR, CHAVAKKAD. BY ADVS. SRI.S.U.NAZAR SRI.MANSOOR.B.H. RESPONDENTS/PETITIONERS: 1 NAZRIN D/O.ISMAIL, MELEPURAYIDATHIL HOUSE, P.O.KALLUR, AMBALLUR, THRISSUR - 680 024. 2 MINOR AYAN 10 MONTHS (REPRESENTED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT/ MOTHER). BY ADV. SRI.M.PREMCHAND THIS REV.PETITION(FAMILY COURT) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02.04.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: RPFC NO.99 OF 2016

ORDER

The learned counsel for the revision petitioner submitted that the revision petition is not pressed. The said submission is recorded. Accordingly, this revision petition is dismissed as not pressed. Sd/- DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH JUDGE BR

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial