Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Niyas vs State of Kerala

NIYAS vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Apr 10, 2025
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1281339

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Bail Appl./5208/2025
Subject
MRTP

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

MRTP

Key legal issue
MRTP

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

NIYAS

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

.....that is the case, the petitioner is entitled statutory bail because 60 days is over and the offence alleged is only under sec. 22(b) of the ndps act. therefore, the petitioner is entitled statutory bail.therefore, this bail application is allowed with the following directions:1. petitioner shall be bail appl. no. 5208 of 2025 4released on bail on executing a bond for rs.50,000/- (rupees fifty thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like sum to the satisfaction of the jurisdictional court.2. the petitioner shallappear before the investigating officer for interrogation as and when required. the petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation and shall not, directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/her from disclosing suchfacts to the court or to any policeofficer.3. petitioner shall not leave india bail appl. no. 5208 of 2025 5 without permission of the jurisdictional court.4. petitioner shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which he is accused, or suspected, of the commission of which he is suspected.5. the observations and findings inthis order is only for the purpose of deciding this bail application. the principle laid down by this court in anzar azeez v. state of kerala [2025 scc online ker 1260] is applicable in this case also.6. if any of the above conditions are violated by the petitioner, the jurisdictional court can cancel the bail in accordance to law, even though bail appl. no. 5208 of 2025 6the bail is granted by this court. the prosecution and the victim are at liberty to approach the jurisdictional court to cancel the bail, if there is any violation of the above conditions. sd/- p.v.kunhikrishnan judge sks

Full Judgment

BAIL APPL. NO. 5208 OF 2025 1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN THURSDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF APRIL 2025 / 20TH CHAITHRA, 1947 BAIL APPL. NO. 5208 OF 2025 CRIME NO.279/2025 OF Kilikolloor Police Station, Kollam

PETITIONER/S: NIYAS AGED 23 YEARS S/O NAVAS, NN HOUSE, ASHTAMUDY PO, KOLLAM, PIN - BY ADVS. SREERAJ M.D. NEELANJANA NAIR RESPONDENT/S: STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF KERALA, PIN - 682031 OTHER PRESENT: SRI NOUSHAD K A, SR.PP THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10.04.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: BAIL APPL. NO. 5208 OF 2025 2

P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J -------------------------------------- B.A. No. 5208 of 2025 -------------------------------------- Dated this the 10th day of April, 2025

ORDER

This Bail Application is filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita.

2. Petitioner is an accused in Crime No

registered against the petitioner alleging offences punishable under Section 22(b) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for short 'NDPS Act').

3. The prosecution case is that the accused

was found in possession of 2.01 gms of Methamphetamine. Hence, it is alleged that the accused BAIL APPL. NO. 5208 OF 2025 3 committed the offences. The petitioner was arrested on 03.02.2025.

4. Heard counsel for the petitioner and the Public Prosecutor.

5. The counsel for the petitioner submitted

that the petitioner is in custody from 03.02.2025. The investigation is not over. Therefore, he is entitled statutory bail. The Public Prosecutor opposed the bail application. But, the Public Prosecutor conceded that investigation is not over. If that is the case, the petitioner is entitled statutory bail because 60 days is over and the offence alleged is only under Sec. 22(b) of the NDPS Act. Therefore, the petitioner is entitled statutory bail.

Therefore, this Bail Application is allowed with the following directions:

1. Petitioner shall be BAIL APPL. NO. 5208 OF 2025 4

released on bail on executing a bond for Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like sum to the satisfaction of the jurisdictional Court.

2. The petitioner shall

appear before the Investigating Officer for interrogation as and when required. The petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation and shall not, directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/her from disclosing such

facts to the Court or to any police

officer.

3. Petitioner shall not leave India BAIL APPL. NO. 5208 OF 2025 5 without permission of the jurisdictional Court.

4. Petitioner shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which he is accused, or suspected, of the commission of which he is suspected.

5. The observations and findings in

this order is only for the purpose of deciding this bail application. The principle laid down by this Court in Anzar Azeez v. State of Kerala [2025 SCC OnLine KER 1260] is applicable in this case also.

6. If any of the above conditions are violated by the petitioner, the jurisdictional Court can cancel the bail in accordance to law, even though BAIL APPL. NO. 5208 OF 2025 6

the bail is granted by this Court. The prosecution and the victim are at liberty to approach the jurisdictional court to cancel the bail, if there is any violation of the above conditions. Sd/- P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN JUDGE SKS

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial