Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Shamnad vs State of Kerala

Shamnad vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Apr 04, 2025
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1280246

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Bail Appl./4482/2025
Subject
Motor Vehicles

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Motor Vehicles

Key legal issue
Motor Vehicles

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Shamnad

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

bail appl. no. 4482 of 2025 1in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice p.v.kunhikrishnan friday, the 4th day of april 2025 / 14th chaithra, 1947 bail appl. no. 4482 of 2025 crime no.33/2020 of railway police station, thiruvananthapuram, thiruvananthapuram against the order/judgment dated in sc no.35 of 2022 of additional district court & sessions court - vii, ernakulam / iii additional mact, ernakulam petitioner/s: shamnad aged 32 years s/o shahul hameed, thannithurakal house, palapetty kara, veliyangodevillage, ponnani taluk, malappuram district., pin - 679579 by advs. denizen komath dean denizen komath mereena.j.joseph respondent/s: 1 state of kerala represented by the public prosecutor, high court of kerala, ernakulam., pin - 682031 2 station house officer bail appl. no. 4482 of 2025 2 vadakkekad police station, andathodepo ,thrissurcity,kerala., pin - 679564 other present: sr pp-hrithwik c s this bail application having come up for admission on 04.04.2025, the court on the same day delivered the following: bail appl. no. 4482 of 2025 3 p.v.kunhikrishnan, j -------------------------------------- b.a. no. 4482 of 2025 -------------------------------------- dated this the 4th day of april, 2025orderthe counsel for the petitioner submitted that theorder cancelling the bail is already challenged before thiscourt. if that is the case, this bail application need not be entertained now. the petitioner can file a fresh bail application, if crl.m.c. disposed against him. with the above observation, this bail application is disposed of. sd/- p.v.kunhikrishnan judge sks

Full Judgment

BAIL APPL. NO. 4482 OF 2025 1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN FRIDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF APRIL 2025 / 14TH CHAITHRA, 1947 BAIL APPL. NO. 4482 OF 2025 CRIME NO.33/2020 OF RAILWAY POLICE STATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, Thiruvananthapuram AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED IN SC NO.35 OF 2022 OF ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT & SESSIONS COURT - VII, ERNAKULAM / III ADDITIONAL MACT, ERNAKULAM PETITIONER/S: SHAMNAD AGED 32 YEARS S/O SHAHUL HAMEED, THANNITHURAKAL HOUSE, PALAPETTY KARA, VELIYANGODEVILLAGE, PONNANI TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT., PIN - 679579 BY ADVS. DENIZEN KOMATH DEAN DENIZEN KOMATH MEREENA.J.JOSEPH RESPONDENT/S: 1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM., PIN - 682031 2 STATION HOUSE OFFICER BAIL APPL. NO. 4482 OF 2025 2 VADAKKEKAD POLICE STATION, ANDATHODEPO ,THRISSURCITY,KERALA., PIN - 679564 OTHER PRESENT: SR PP-HRITHWIK C S THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04.04.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: BAIL APPL. NO. 4482 OF 2025 3 P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J -------------------------------------- B.A. No. 4482 of 2025 -------------------------------------- Dated this the 4th day of April, 2025

ORDER

The counsel for the petitioner submitted that the

order cancelling the bail is already challenged before this

Court. If that is the case, this bail application need not be entertained now. The petitioner can file a fresh bail application, if Crl.M.C. disposed against him. With the above observation, this bail application is disposed of. Sd/- P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN JUDGE SKS

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial