Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Vijith V vs State of Kerala

Vijith V vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Mar 28, 2025
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1279079

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Crl.MC/2699/2025
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Vijith V

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

.....on the same day passed the following: crl.mc no. 2699 of 2025 2orderpetitioner’s vehicle bearing registration no.kl-19-g- 2262 was seized in connection with crime no.95 of 2025 registered at the nemom police station for offences punishable under section 272 of bns, 2023 and section 118(e) of the kerala police act, 2011. the crime is registered on the allegation that the vehicle was being used for dumping vegetable waste in a public place.2. learned counsel for the petitioner submits that thevehicle is used in transportation and distribution of vegetables in chala market in thiruvananthapuram. the alleged incident occurred when the vegetables being transported fell on the road due to a mistake on the part of the driver. moreover, the accused admitted his guilt and also paid the penalty imposed. therefore, no purpose is served by detaining the petitioner's vehicle.crl.mc no. 2699 of 2025 33. learned public prosecutor submitted that, if at all the vehicle is released, that should be on stringent conditions.4. as held by the apex court in sunderbhai ambalaldesai vs. state of gujarat [(2002) 10 scc 283], it is always appropriate to release seized vehicles, rather than detaining them resulting in damage and deterioration of value. therefore, even though the alleged offence is serious, the vehicle can be released.5. the crl.m.c is hence allowed and annexure 4order is quashed. the petitioner’s vehicle bearingregistration no. kl-19-g-2262 shall be released to him, subject to the following conditions;(i) petitioner shall execute a self bond for rs.1,00,000/- (rupees one lakh only) before the jurisdictional magistrate and undertake to produce the vehicle as and when directed. crl.mc no. 2699 of 2025 4(ii) petitioner shall not transfer, sublet, lease or sell the vehicle to any person, until conclusion of the criminal case.(iii) petitioner shall produce the vehicle along with registration certificate or sale letter, as the case may.....

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.G.ARUN FRIDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF MARCH 2025 / 7TH CHAITHRA, 1947 CRL.MC NO. 2699 OF 2025 PETITIONER/ACCUSED: VIJITH V AGED 30 YEARS S/O VIJAYAN, KIDARAKUZHI, PUTHENVEEDU, THIRUPURAM P.O, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695525. BY ADV APPU BABU RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT: STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, PIN - 682031. SRI. M.C. ASHI, PP. THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28.03.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: CRL.MC NO. 2699 OF 2025 2

ORDER

Petitioner’s vehicle bearing registration No.KL-19-G- 2262 was seized in connection with Crime No.95 of 2025 registered at the Nemom Police Station for offences punishable under Section 272 of BNS, 2023 and Section 118(e) of the Kerala Police Act, 2011. The crime is registered on the allegation that the vehicle was being used for dumping vegetable waste in a public place.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

vehicle is used in transportation and distribution of vegetables in Chala Market in Thiruvananthapuram. The alleged incident occurred when the vegetables being transported fell on the road due to a mistake on the part of the driver. Moreover, the accused admitted his guilt and also paid the penalty imposed. Therefore, no purpose is served by detaining the petitioner's vehicle.

CRL.MC NO. 2699 OF 2025 3

3. Learned Public Prosecutor submitted that, if at all the vehicle is released, that should be on stringent conditions.

4. As held by the Apex Court in Sunderbhai Ambalal

Desai Vs. State of Gujarat [(2002) 10 SCC 283], it is always appropriate to release seized vehicles, rather than detaining them resulting in damage and deterioration of value. Therefore, even though the alleged offence is serious, the vehicle can be released.

5. The Crl.M.C is hence allowed and Annexure 4

order is quashed. The petitioner’s vehicle bearing

Registration No. KL-19-G-2262 shall be released to him, subject to the following conditions;

(i) Petitioner shall execute a self bond for Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh Only) before the jurisdictional Magistrate and undertake to produce the vehicle as and when directed. CRL.MC NO. 2699 OF 2025 4

(ii) Petitioner shall not transfer, sublet, lease or sell the vehicle to any person, until conclusion of the criminal case.

(iii) Petitioner shall produce the vehicle along with Registration Certificate or Sale Letter, as the case may be, during the confiscation proceedings, if any, initiated.

(iv) If petitioner commits similar offence in future, police

will be free to repossess the vehicle. Sd/- V.G.ARUN JUDGE Sru CRL.MC NO. 2699 OF 2025 5 APPENDIX OF CRL.MC 2699/2025 PETITIONER’S ANNEXURES Annexure 1 THE TRUE COPY OF THE FIR DATED 24.01.2025 OF NEMOM POLICE STATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM Annexure 2 THE TRUE COPY OF THE SALE LETTER DATED 17.03.2024 IS PRODUCED HEREWITH AND MARKED AS ANNEXURE 2. Annexure 3 THE TRUE COPY OF THE VEHICLE RC DATED 05.07.2016 IS PRODUCED HEREWITH AND MARKED AS ANNEXURE 3. Annexure 4 THE CERTIFIED COPY OF THE ORDER IN CMP

JUDICIAL FIRST-CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT VII, NEYYATTINKARA IS PRODUCED HEREWITH AND MARKED AS ANNEXURE 4. Annexure 5 THE TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT OF FINE DATED 15.03.2025

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial