Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Rayees P vs State of Kerala

Rayees P vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Mar 28, 2025
~4 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1278752

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Bail Appl./3703/2025
Subject
MRTP

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

MRTP

Key legal issue
MRTP

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Rayees P

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

.....act.3. the prosecution case is that, on 7.02.2025 at 4 pm,at the two-wheeler parking space of kalanthodu mes college, following the dispute arise in connection with the conduct of association day of college, all the four accused assaulted the defacto complainant, a 2nd year degree student, with the hands and a1 caused grievous hurt to him by hitting on his face with an iron ring. it is alleged that the victim sustained a fracture on the left orbit.hence it is alleged that the accused committed the above said offences.4. heard the learned counsel appearing for thepetitioners, the learned counsel appearing for the defacto complainant and the learned public prosecutor. learned public prosecutor seriously opposed the bail application.5. after hearing both sides, i think this is not a fit case,in which orders u/s.482 bnss can be passed. at this stage the counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners will surrender before the investigating officer. the counsel also submitted that there may be a direction to produce the petitioners after interrogation before the jurisdictional court and there may be a direction to the jurisdictional court to consider the bail application on the date of production of the petitioners. i think that prayer can be allowed.6. considering the submission of the counsel for thepetitioners, this bail application is disposed of with the following directions. 1) the petitioners will surrender before the investigating officer within two weeks from today.2) if the petitioners surrender before the investigating officer as directed above, the investigating officer is free to interrogate the petitioners and shall produce the petitioners before the jurisdictional court on the date of surrender itself. 3) the petitioners are free to file a bail application before the jurisdictional court at the time of producing them before the jurisdictional court. if such a bail application is filed with advance copy to the prosecutor concerned, the.....

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN FRIDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF MARCH 2025 / 7TH CHAITHRA, 1947 BAIL APPL. NO. 3703 OF 2025 CRIME NO.115/2025 OF KUNNAMANGALAM POLICE STATION, KOZHIKODE AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED 10.03.2025 IN CRMC NO.216 OF 2025 OF DISTRICT COURT & SESSIONS COURT,KOZHIKODE PETITIONER(S)/ACCUSED 1 & 4: 1 RAYEES P AGED 20 YEARS S/O ABDUL SAMEER PUTHALATH HOUSE, ADIVARAM P.O PUTHUPPADI, THAMARASSERY KOZHIKODE, PIN - 686582 2 MUHAMMED RAMSHAD AGED 20 YEARS S/O MUHAMMED K KODUKKILPOYIL ADIVARAM P.O PUTHUPPADI THAMARASSERY, KOZHIKODE, PIN - 686582 BY ADV MILLU DANDAPANI RESPONDENT(S)/STATE: 1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF KERALA, PIN - 682031 2 MUHAMMED MINHAJ S/O ASHARAF M.P, AGED 21 YEARS, MUKKOTTAPURAYIL, CHATHANKAVU MINI, KUNNAMANGALAM, KOZHIKODE (IS IMPLEADED AS ADDL.2ND RESPONDENT AS PER ORDER DATED 28.03.2025 IN CRL.M.A. NO.1/2025) BY ADV. PRASUDHA.S SR PP - SRI.HRITHWIK C S THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28.03.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J -------------------------------- ------------------------------- Dated this the 28th day of March, 2025

ORDER

This Bail application is filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita.

2. Petitioners are the accused in Crime No.115/2025 of

Kunnamangalam Police Station, Kozhikode. The above case is registered against the petitioners alleging offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2) & 118(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for short 'BNS') and Section 4 of the Kerala Prohibition of Ragging Act.

3. The prosecution case is that, on 7.02.2025 at 4 pm,

at the two-wheeler parking space of Kalanthodu MES College, following the dispute arise in connection with the conduct of Association Day of College, all the four accused assaulted the defacto complainant, a 2nd year degree student, with the hands and A1 caused grievous hurt to him by hitting on his face with an iron ring. It is alleged that the victim sustained a fracture on the left orbit.

Hence it is alleged that the accused committed the above said offences.

4. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the

petitioners, the learned counsel appearing for the defacto complainant and the learned Public Prosecutor. Learned Public Prosecutor seriously opposed the bail application.

5. After hearing both sides, I think this is not a fit case,

in which orders u/s.482 BNSS can be passed. At this stage the counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners will surrender before the Investigating Officer. The counsel also submitted that there may be a direction to produce the petitioners after interrogation before the jurisdictional court and there may be a direction to the jurisdictional court to consider the bail application on the date of production of the petitioners. I think that prayer can be allowed.

6. Considering the submission of the counsel for the

petitioners, this bail application is disposed of with the following directions. 1) The petitioners will surrender before the Investigating Officer within two weeks from today.

2) If the petitioners surrender before the Investigating Officer as directed above, the Investigating Officer is free to interrogate the petitioners and shall produce the petitioners before the jurisdictional court on the date of surrender itself. 3) The petitioners are free to file a bail application before the jurisdictional court at the time of producing them before the jurisdictional court. If such a bail application is filed with advance copy to the prosecutor concerned, the jurisdictional court will consider that bail application in accordance with law and pass appropriate orders in it preferably on the date of filing of the same itself. 4) The Investigating Officer is free to file custody application, if necessary, at the time of producing the petitioners and if such an application is filed, the jurisdictional court is free to pass appropriate orders in it also.

Sd/- P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, JUDGE DM

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial